Cited by 41Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

Method for assessing the statistical significance of mass spectral similarities using basic local alignment search tool statistics

Matsuda, Fumio, Tsugawa, Hiroshi, Fukusaki, Eiichiro·2013·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

A novel method for assessing the statistical significance of mass spectral similarities was developed using modified basic local alignment search tool (BLAST; Karlin-Altschul) statistics. In gas chromatography/mass spectrometry-based metabolomics, many signals in raw metabolome data are identified on the basis of unexpected similarities among mass spectra and the spectra of standards. Since there is inevitably noise in the observed spectra, a list of identified metabolites includes some false positives. In the developed method, electron ionization (EI) mass spectrometry-BLAST, a similarity score of two mass spectra is calculated using a general scoring scheme, from which the probability of obtaining the score by chance (P value) is calculated. For this purpose, a simple rule for converting a unit EI mass spectrum to a mass spectral sequence as well as a score matrix for aligned mass spectral sequences was developed. A Monte Carlo simulation using randomly generated mass spectral sequences demonstrated that the null distribution or the expected number of hits (E value) follows modified Karlin-Altschul statistics. A metabolite data set obtained from green tea extract was analyzed using the developed method. Among 171 metabolite signals in the metabolome data, 93 signals were identified on the basis of significant similarities (P < 0.015) with reference data. Since the expected number of false positives is 2.6, the false discovery rate was estimated to be 2.8%, indicating that the search threshold (P < 0.015) is reasonable for metabolite identification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac401564v

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In untargeted metabolomics and lipidomics, false discovery rates are difficult to compute and largely not accurate.

    “In untargeted metabolomics and lipidomics false discovery rates are difficult to compute and largely not accurate (Stein, 1994; Jeong et al., 2011; Matsuda et al., 2013; Kim and Zhang, 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matsuda, F., Tsugawa, H., & Fukusaki, E.
Affiliations
  • RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science (JP)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
Corresponding author
Matsuda, Fumio
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2013-08-14
Volume
85
Issue
17
Pages
8291-8297
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W1971434441
Cited by
41
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25871136, 25820400)
  • Strategic International Collaborative Research Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
statistical significance, false discovery rate, metabolite identification, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, metabolomics, electron ionization mass spectra, Monte Carlo simulation, null distribution, green tea extract
MeSH terms
Animals, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Monte Carlo Method, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Mice, Metabolome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review