The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hybridization Chain Reaction Amplification of MicroRNA Detection with a Tetrahedral DNA Nanostructure-Based Electrochemical Biosensor
Abstract
There remains a great challenge in the sensitive detection of microRNA because of the short length and low abundance of microRNAs in cells. Here, we have demonstrated an ultrasensitive detection platform for microRNA by combining the tetrahedral DNA nanostructure probes and hybridization chain reaction (HCR) amplification. The detection limits for DNA and microRNA are 100 aM and 10 aM (corresponding to 600 microRNAs in a 100 μL sample), respectively. Compared to the widely used supersandwich amplification, the detection limits are improved by 3 orders of magnitude. The uncontrolled surface immobilization and consumption of target molecules that limit the amplification efficiency of supersandwich are eliminated in our platform. Taking advantage of DNA nanotechnology, we employed three-dimensional tetrahedral DNA nanostructure as the scaffold to immobilize DNA recognition probes to increase the reactivity and accessibility, while DNA nanowire tentacles are used for efficient signal amplification by capturing multiple catalytic enzymes in a highly ordered way. The synergetic effect of DNA tetrahedron and nanowire tentacles have proven to greatly improve sensitivity for both DNA and microRNA detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bartel (2004) · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5 · Cited by 34,714
Prediction of Mammalian MicroRNA Targets
Lewis, B. P., Shih, I.-H., Jones-Rhoades, M. W., Bartel, D. P., & Burge, C. B. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)01018-3 · Cited by 5,199
Cited by
Aptamer-integrated DNA nanostructures for biosensing, bioimaging and cancer therapy
Meng, H.-M., Liu, H., Kuai, H., Peng, R., Mo, L., & Zhang, X.-B. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00645g · Cited by 608
Nucleic Acid Biosensors: Recent Advances and Perspectives
Du, Y., & Dong, S. (2017) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04190 · Cited by 429
Kelley, S. O., Mirkin, C. A., Walt, D. R., Ismagilov, R. F., Toner, M., & Sargent, E. H. (2014) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.261 · Cited by 398
An electrochemical clamp assay for direct, rapid analysis of circulating nucleic acids in serum
Das, J., Ivanov, I., Montermini, L., Rak, J., Sargent, E. H., & Kelley, S. O. (2015) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2270 · Cited by 274
Recent advances in biosensor technology in assessment of early diabetes biomarkers
Salek-Maghsoudi, A., Vakhshiteh, F., Torabi, R., Hassani, S., Ganjali, M. R., Norouzi, P., Hosseini, M., & Abdollahi, M. (2018) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2017.07.047 · Cited by 174
Methods and novel technology for microRNA quantification in colorectal cancer screening
Moody, L., He, H., Pan, Y.-X., & Chen, H. (2017) · Clinical Epigenetics · doi:10.1186/s13148-017-0420-9 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Ge, Z., Lin, M., Wang, P., Pei, H., Yan, J., Shi, J., Huang, Q., He, D., Fan, C., & Zuo, X.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-02-04
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2124-2130
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2008662133
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
