The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elimination of Undesirable Water Layers in Solid-Contact Polymeric Ion-Selective Electrodes
Open accessAbstract
This study aimed to develop a novel approach for the production of analytically robust and miniaturized polymeric ion sensors that are vitally important in modern analytical chemistry (e.g., clinical chemistry using single blood droplets, modern biosensors measuring clouds of ions released from nanoparticle-tagged biomolecules, laboratory-on-a-chip applications, etc.). This research has shown that the use of a water-repellent poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(decyl methacrylate) (PMMA/PDMA) copolymer as the ion-sensing membrane, along with a hydrophobic poly(3-octylthiophene 2,5-diyl) (POT) solid contact as the ion-to-electron transducer, is an excellent strategy for avoiding the detrimental water layer formed at the buried interface of solid-contact ion-selective electrodes (ISEs). Accordingly, it has been necessary to implement a rigorous surface analysis scheme employing electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), in situ neutron reflectometry/EIS (NR/EIS), secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), and small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) to probe structurally the solid-contact/membrane interface, so as to identify the conditions that eliminate the undesirable water layer in all solid-state polymeric ion sensors. In this work, we provide the first experimental evidence that the PMMA/PDMA copolymer system is susceptible to water "pooling" at the interface in areas surrounding physical imperfections in the solid contact, with the exposure time for such an event in a PMMA/PDMA copolymer ISE taking nearly 20 times longer than that for a plasticized poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) ISE, and the simultaneous use of a hydrophobic POT solid contact with a PMMA/PDMA membrane can eliminate totally this water layer problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bobacka, J. (1999) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac990497z · Cited by 686
Cited by
Rational design of all-solid-state ion-selective electrodes and reference electrodes
Hu, J., Stein, A., & Bühlmann, P. (2016) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2015.11.004 · Cited by 586
Shao, Y., Ying, Y., & Ping, J. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00587k · Cited by 472
Wearable potentiometric ion sensors
Parrilla, M., Cuartero, M., & Crespo, G. A. (2019) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2018.11.024 · Cited by 334
Privett, B. J., Shin, J. H., & Schoenfisch, M. H. (2010) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac101075n · Cited by 334
Preparation of all solid-state potentiometric ion sensors with polymer-CNT composites
Zhu, J., Qin, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2009) · Electrochemistry Communications · doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2009.06.025 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Veder, J.-P., De Marco, R., Clarke, G., Chester, R., Nelson, A., Prince, K., Pretsch, E., & Bakker, E.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-08-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6731-6740
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2046127724
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.