The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wearable potentiometric ion sensors
Open accessAbstract
Wearable potentiometric ion sensors (WPISs) have become an exciting analytical platform that combines chemical, material and electronic efforts to supply physiological information during certain human activities. The real possibility of wearing an analytical device with diverse configurations—sweatband, patches, garments—without disturbing the welfare of the carrier has enabled potentiometric ion sensors both as health quality and sport performance controllers. Recent studies show a large involvement of WPISs in the following of critical biomarkers (timely or continuously), such as sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, ammonium and chloride, which are present at relatively high concentrations in sweat (∼mM levels). Certainly, the non-invasive nature of WPISs and other significant features, e.g., simplicity and cost-effectiveness, have broadened new horizons in relation to applied analytical chemistry. This has been pointed out in the literature over the last decade with the predominance of two analytical outcomes: (i) the improvement of sport performance as a result of continuous detection of ions in sweat (health status of the individual) while decreasing physiological complications (injuries, muscle cramps, fatigue and dehydration) during practice; and (ii) advancements in clinical diagnostics and preventive medicine as a consequence of the monitoring of the health status of patients suffering from any kind of disorder. Beyond the undeniable importance of the integration of WPISs to satisfy current societal needs, the following crucial questions about misleading and missing analytical features need to be answered: To what extent is WPIS technology a reliable analytical tool for the quantification of ions? Is cross-validation the current bottleneck toward further progress? Which are the fundamental steps involving the ion-selective electrode side that would benefit WPIS outcomes? Why is sweat the main (and almost the only) biological fluid to be monitored by WPISs? What is the best sampling strategy to be incorporated into WPIS devices for on-body monitoring of sweat? Which precision limits should be considered to assure a reliable decision-making process? Accordingly, this review focuses on the progression of WPISs from an analytical perspective—merely our vision of the field—within the period between 2010 and 2018. An updated search using specific keywords (wearable, ion, potentiometry, sensor) provided 43 contributions, which are herein highlighted, with a sustainable acceleration over the last three years. Thus, this review describes the current state of WPIS technology, the construction of wearable all-solid-state potentiometric sensors, critical requirements of potentiometric sensors to be fulfilled in a wearable configuration and key features regarding the ideal implementation of WPISs as reliable messengers of physiological information in real scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis
Gao, W., Emaminejad, S., Nyein, H. Y. Y., Challa, S., Chen, K., Peck, A., Fahad, H. M., Ota, H., Shiraki, H., Kiriya, D., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16521 · Cited by 5,087
Lee, H., Choi, T. K., Lee, Y. B., Cho, H. R., Ghaffari, R., Wang, L., Choi, H. J., Chung, T. D., Lu, N., Hyeon, T., et al. (2016) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.38 · Cited by 1,802
Lab-on-Skin: A Review of Flexible and Stretchable Electronics for Wearable Health Monitoring
Liu, Y., Pharr, M., & Salvatore, G. A. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b04898 · Cited by 1,725
Bariya, M., Nyein, H. Y. Y., & Javey, A. (2018) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-018-0043-y · Cited by 1,486
Wearable sensors: modalities, challenges, and prospects
Heikenfeld, J., Jajack, A., Rogers, J., Gutruf, P., Tian, L., Pan, T., Li, R., Khine, M., Kim, J., Wang, J., et al. (2018) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c7lc00914c · Cited by 1,434
Monitoring of Vital Signs with Flexible and Wearable Medical Devices
Khan, Y., Ostfeld, A. E., Lochner, C. M., Pierre, A., & Arias, A. C. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201504366 · Cited by 1,408
Wearable and flexible electronics for continuous molecular monitoring
Yang, Y., & Gao, W. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00730b · Cited by 1,315
Detection of perchlorate and the soluble chemistry of martian soil at the phoenix lander site
Hecht, M. H., Kounaves, S. P., Quinn, R. C., West, S. J., Young, S. M. M., Ming, D. W., Catling, D. C., Clark, B. C., Boynton, W. V., Hoffman, J., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172466 · Cited by 1,166
Recent Advances in Flexible and Stretchable Bio‐Electronic Devices Integrated with Nanomaterials
Choi, S., Lee, H., Ghaffari, R., Hyeon, T., & Kim, D. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201504150 · Cited by 1,104
Nutrition and Athletic Performance
(2009) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31890eb86 · Cited by 1,084
Cited by
Wearable chemical sensors for biomarker discovery in the omics era
Sempionatto, J. R., Lasalde-Ramírez, J. A., Mahato, K., Wang, J., & Gao, W. (2022) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-022-00439-w · Cited by 613
Flexible Plasmonic Biosensors for Healthcare Monitoring: Progress and Prospects
Song, L., Chen, J., Xu, B. B., & Huang, Y. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c07176 · Cited by 186
Wearable sweat sensing for prolonged, semicontinuous, and nonobtrusive health monitoring
Moonen, E. J. M., Haakma, J. R., Peri, E., Pelssers, E., Mischi, M., & den Toonder, J. M. J. (2020) · VIEW · doi:10.1002/viw.20200077 · Cited by 86
A review of sampling, energy supply and intelligent monitoring for long-term sweat sensors
Yang, P., Wei, G., Liu, A., Huo, F., & Zhang, Z. (2022) · npj Flexible Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41528-022-00165-9 · Cited by 77
Recent advances in flexible sweat glucose biosensors
Zhou, W., He, Q., Ye, H., Ye, C., Wu, X., & Chu, J. (2021) · Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6463/ac14ef · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Parrilla, M., Cuartero, M., & Crespo, G. A.
- Venue
- TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 110
- Pages
- 303-320
- ISSN
- 0165-9936 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2901019607
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 18.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wearable potentiometric ion sensors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.trac.2018.11.024
- The paper
- Parrilla, M., Cuartero, M., & Crespo, G. A. (2019). Wearable potentiometric ion sensors. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.11.024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.