The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recursive Segment-Wise Peak Alignment of Biological 1H NMR Spectra for Improved Metabolic Biomarker Recovery
Abstract
Chemical shift variation in small-molecule (1)H NMR signals of biofluids complicates biomarker information recovery in metabonomic studies when using multivariate statistical and pattern recognition tools. Current peak realignment methods are generally time-consuming or align major peaks at the expense of minor peak shift accuracy. We present a novel recursive segment-wise peak alignment (RSPA) method to reduce variability in peak positions across the multiple (1)H NMR spectra used in metabonomic studies. The method refines a segmentation of reference and test spectra in a top-down fashion, sequentially subdividing the initial larger segments, as required, to improve the local spectral alignment. We also describe a general procedure that allows robust comparison of realignment quality of various available methods for a range of peak intensities. The RSPA method is illustrated with respect to 140 (1)H NMR rat urine spectra from a caloric restriction study and is compared with several other widely used peak alignment methods. We demonstrate the superior performance of the RSPA alignment over a wide range of peaks and its capacity to enhance interpretability and robustness of multivariate statistical tools. The approach is widely applicable for NMR-based metabolic studies and is potentially suitable for many other types of data sets such as chromatographic profiles and MS data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics
Wold, S., Sjöström, M., & Eriksson, L. (2001) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7439(01)00155-1 · Cited by 10,084
Cited by
Gut Microbiomes of Malawian Twin Pairs Discordant for Kwashiorkor
Smith, M. I., Yatsunenko, T., Manary, M. J., Trehan, I., Mkakosya, R., Cheng, J., Kau, A. L., Rich, S. S., Concannon, P., Mychaleckyj, J. C., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1229000 · Cited by 1,173
Self-citationFat, fibre and cancer risk in African Americans and rural Africans
O’Keefe, S. J. D., Li, J. V., Lahti, L., Ou, J., Carbonero, F., Mohammed, K., Posma, J. M., Kinross, J., Wahl, E., Ruder, E., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7342 · Cited by 982
Self-citationicoshift: A versatile tool for the rapid alignment of 1D NMR spectra
Savorani, F., Tomasi, G., & Engelsen, S. B. (2010) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2009.11.012 · Cited by 850
Understanding the role of gut microbiome–host metabolic signal disruption in health and disease
Holmes, E., Li, J. V., Athanasiou, T., Ashrafian, H., & Nicholson, J. K. (2011) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2011.05.006 · Cited by 541
Self-citationGut Microbiota Profiling: Metabolomics Based Approach to Unravel Compounds Affecting Human Health
Vernocchi, P., Del Chierico, F., & Putignani, L. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01144 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Veselkov, K. A., Lindon, J. C., Ebbels, T. M. D., Crockford, D., Volynkin, V. V., Holmes, E., Davies, D. B., & Nicholson, J. K.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-12-02
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-66
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2078520277
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.