The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controlling the Retention of Small Molecules in Emulsion Microdroplets for Use in Cell-Based Assays
Abstract
Water-in-oil microdroplets in microfluidics are well-defined individual picoliter reaction compartments and, as such, have great potential for quantitative high-throughput biological screening. This, however, depends upon contents of the droplets not leaking out into the oil phase. To assess the mechanism of possible leaking, the retention of various fluorescein derivatives from droplets formed in mineral oil and stored for hours in a reservoir on chip was studied. Leaking into the oil phase was observed and was shown to be dependent on the nature of the compounds and on the concentration of the silicone-based polymeric surfactant Abil EM 90 used. In experiments in which droplets filled with fluorescein were mixed with droplets filled with only buffer, the rate of efflux from filled droplets to empty droplets was dependent on the number of neighboring droplets of different composition. Buffer droplets with five fluorescein-containing neighbors took up the fluorophore 4.5 times faster than buffer droplets without fluorescein neighbors. The addition of bovine serum albumin (BSA) substantially reduced leaking. A formulation with 5% BSA reduces leaking of the fluorophore from 45% to 3%. Inclusion of BSA enabled experiments to be carried out over periods up to 18 h, without substantial leaking (<5%). We demonstrate the utility of this additive by following the enzymatic activity of alkaline phosphatase expressed by Escherichia coli cells. The ability to reliably compartmentalize genotype (cell) and phenotype (reaction product) is the basis for using microdroplets in directed evolution studies, and the approaches described herein provide a test system for assessing emulsion formulations for such purposes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millisecond Kinetics on a Microfluidic Chip Using Nanoliters of Reagents
Song, H., & Ismagilov, R. F. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0354566 · Cited by 693
Cited by
Single-cell analysis and sorting using droplet-based microfluidics
Mazutis, L., Gilbert, J., Ung, W. L., Weitz, D. A., Griffiths, A. D., & Heyman, J. A. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.046 · Cited by 1,355
Seemann, R., Brinkmann, M., Pfohl, T., & Herminghaus, S. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/1/016601 · Cited by 1,049
Quan, P.-L., Sauzade, M., & Brouzes, E. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18041271 · Cited by 664
Currin, A., Swainston, N., Day, P. J., & Kell, D. B. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00351a · Cited by 388
Droplet microfluidics: recent developments and future applications
Casadevall i Solvas, X., & deMello, A. (2011) · Chem. Commun. · doi:10.1039/c0cc02474k · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Courtois, F., Olguin, L. F., Whyte, G., Theberge, A. B., Huck, W. T. S., Hollfelder, F., & Abell, C.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-03-13
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3008-3016
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2050255833
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.