The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of the Fluorescence Quantum Yield of Quantum Dots: Suitable Procedures and Achievable Uncertainties
Abstract
Despite the increasing use of semiconductor nanocrystals (quantum dots, QDs) with unique size-controlled optical and chemical properties in (bio)analytical detection, biosensing and fluorescence imaging and the obvious relevance of reliable values of fluorescence quantum yields for these applications, evaluated procedures for the determination of the fluorescence quantum yields (Φ f ) of these materials are still missing. This limits the value of literature data of QDs in comparison to common organic dyes and hampers the comparability of the performance of QDs from different sources or manufacturers. This encouraged us to investigate achievable uncertainties for the determination of Φ f values of these chromophores and to illustrate common pitfalls exemplarily for differently sized water-soluble CdTe QDs. Special attention is dedicated to the colloidal nature and complicated surface chemistry of QDs thereby deriving procedures to minimize uncertainties related to these features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dabbousi, B. O., Rodriguez-Viejo, J., Mikulec, F. V., Heine, J. R., Mattoussi, H., Ober, R., Jensen, K. F., & Bawendi, M. G. (1997) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp971091y · Cited by 4,229
Cited by
Fluorescence Quantum Yields of a Series of Red and Near-Infrared Dyes Emitting at 600−1000 nm
Rurack, K., & Spieles, M. (2011) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac101329h · Cited by 734
Self-citationHao, M., Bai, Y., Zeiske, S., Ren, L., Liu, J., Yuan, Y., Zarrabi, N., Cheng, N., Ghasemi, M., Chen, P., et al. (2020) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0535-7 · Cited by 587
Origin of the Size-Dependent Stokes Shift in CsPbBr 3 Perovskite Nanocrystals
Brennan, M. C., Herr, J. E., Nguyen-Beck, T. S., Zinna, J., Draguta, S., Rouvimov, S., Parkhill, J., & Kuno, M. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.7b05683 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Grabolle, M., Spieles, M., Lesnyak, V., Gaponik, N., Eychmüller, A., & Resch-Genger, U.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-07-02
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 6285-6294
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2058366845
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of the Fluorescence Quantum Yield of Quantum Dots: Suitable Procedures and Achievable Uncertainties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac900308v
- The paper
- Grabolle, M., Spieles, M., Lesnyak, V., Gaponik, N., Eychmüller, A., & Resch-Genger, U. (2009). Determination of the Fluorescence Quantum Yield of Quantum Dots: Suitable Procedures and Achievable Uncertainties. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac900308v
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
