The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electrochemical Detection for Paper-Based Microfluidics
Abstract
We report the first demonstration of electrochemical detection for paper-based microfluidic devices. Photolithography was used to make microfluidic channels on filter paper, and screen-printing technology was used to fabricate electrodes on the paper-based microfluidic devices. Screen-printed electrodes on paper were characterized using cyclic voltammetry to demonstrate the basic electrochemical performance of the system. The utility of our devices was then demonstrated with the determination of glucose, lactate, and uric acid in biological samples using oxidase enzyme (glucose oxidase, lactate oxidase, and uricase, respectively) reactions. Oxidase enzyme reactions produce H2O2 while decomposing their respective substrates, and therefore a single electrode type is needed for detection of multiple species. Selectivity of the working electrode for H2O2 was improved using Prussian Blue as a redox mediator. The determination of glucose, lactate, and uric acid in control serum samples was performed using chronoamperometry at the optimal detection potential for H2O2 (0 V versus the on-chip Ag/AgCl reference electrode). Levels of glucose and lactate in control serum samples measured using the paper devices were 4.9 +/- 0.6 and 1.2 +/- 0.2 mM (level I control sample), and 16.3 +/- 0.7 and 3.2 +/- 0.3 mM (level II control sample), respectively, and were within error of the values measured using traditional tests. This study shows the successful integration of paper-based microfluidics and electrochemical detection as an easy-to-use, inexpensive, and portable alternative for point of care monitoring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Device integration of electrochemical biosensors
Wu, J., Liu, H., Chen, W., Ma, B., & Ju, H. (2023) · Nature Reviews Bioengineering · doi:10.1038/s44222-023-00032-w · Cited by 895
Beyond the lateral flow assay: A review of paper-based microfluidics
Carrell, C., Kava, A., Nguyen, M., Menger, R., Munshi, Z., Call, Z., Nussbaum, M., & Henry, C. (2019) · Microelectronic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mee.2018.12.002 · Cited by 336
Self-citationOrigami multiple paper-based electrochemical biosensors for pesticide detection
Arduini, F., Cinti, S., Caratelli, V., Amendola, L., Palleschi, G., & Moscone, D. (2019) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2018.10.014 · Cited by 322
Ruecha, N., Rodthongkum, N., Cate, D. M., Volckens, J., Chailapakul, O., & Henry, C. S. (2015) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2015.02.064 · Cited by 317
Self-citationEmbroidered electrochemical sensors for biomolecular detection
Liu, X., & Lillehoj, P. B. (2016) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c6lc00307a · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Dungchai, W., Chailapakul, O., & Henry, C. S.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-06-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 5821-5826
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2068311077
- Cited by
- 1,224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrochemical Detection for Paper-Based Microfluidics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac9007573
- The paper
- Dungchai, W., Chailapakul, O., & Henry, C. S. (2009). Electrochemical Detection for Paper-Based Microfluidics. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9007573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.