The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chromatographic Hydrophobicity Index by Fast-Gradient RP-HPLC: A High-Throughput Alternative to log P/log D
Abstract
A new chromatographic hydrophobicity index (CHI) is described which can be used as part of a protocol for high-throughput (50-100 compounds/day) physicochemical property profiling for rational drug design. The index is derived from retention times (t(R)) observed in a fast gradient reversed-phase HPLC method. The isocratic retention factors (log k') were measured for a series of 76 structurally unrelated compounds by using various concentrations of acetonitrile in the mobile phase. By plotting the log k' as a function of the acetonitrile concentration, the slope (S) and the intercept (log k'(w)) values were calculated. The previously validated index of hydrophobicity φ(0) was calculated as -log k'(w)/S. A good linear correlation was obtained between the gradient retention time values, t(R) and the isocratically determined φ(0) values for the 76 compounds. The constants of this linear correlation can be used to calculate CHI. For most compounds, CHI is between 0 and 100 and in this range it approximates to the percentage (by volume) of acetonitrile required to achieve an equal distribution of compound between the mobile and the stationary phases. CHI values can be measured using acidic, neutral, or slightly basic eluents. Values corresponding to the neutral form of molecules could be measured for 52 of the compounds and showed good correlation (r = 0.851) to the calculated octanol/water partition coefficient (c log P) values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meyer, H. (1899) · Archiv für Experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie · doi:10.1007/bf01834479 · Cited by 1,014
Calculating log Poct from structures
Leo, A. J. (1993) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00020a001 · Cited by 695
Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry
(2007) · Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1002/9783527610907.scard · Cited by 298
Modeling oil—water partitioning and membrane permeation using reversed-phase chromatography
Lambert, W. J. (1993) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/0021-9673(93)80814-o · Cited by 185
Valkó, K., & Slégel, P. (1993) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/0021-9673(93)80506-4 · Cited by 162
Self-citationValko, K. L. (1984) · Journal of Liquid Chromatography · doi:10.1080/01483918408074054 · Cited by 138
RP-HPLC Retention Data for Measuring Structural Similarity of Compounds for QSAR Studies
Valko, K. L. (1987) · Journal of Liquid Chromatography · doi:10.1080/01483918708066793 · Cited by 34
The role of chromatography in drug design
Valko, K. L. (1987) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/0165-9936(87)87091-7 · Cited by 25
Cited by
The influence of lipophilicity in drug discovery and design
Arnott, J. A., & Planey, S. L. (2012) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1517/17460441.2012.714363 · Cited by 868
Physicochemical Profiling (Solubility, Permeability and Charge State)
Avdeef, A. (2001) · Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/1568026013395100 · Cited by 587
Quantitative structure–(chromatographic) retention relationships
Héberger, K. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.108 · Cited by 398
Young, R. J., Green, D. V. S., Luscombe, C. N., & Hill, A. P. (2011) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2011.06.001 · Cited by 311
Pappalardi, M. B., Keenan, K., Cockerill, M., Kellner, W. A., Stowell, A., Sherk, C., Wong, K., Pathuri, S., Briand, J., Steidel, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-021-00249-x · Cited by 283
ElogPoct: A Tool for Lipophilicity Determination in Drug Discovery
Lombardo, F., Shalaeva, M. Y., Tupper, K. A., Gao, F., & Abraham, M. H. (2000) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0000822 · Cited by 261
Separation methods for estimating octanol–water partition coefficients
Poole, S. K., & Poole, C. F. (2003) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2003.08.032 · Cited by 253
Xiang, Q., Shan, G., Wu, W., Jin, H., & Zhu, L. (2018) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.009 · Cited by 43
Transport efficiency of AtGTR1 dependents on the hydrophobicity of transported glucosinolates
Chung, Y.-C., Cheng, H.-Y., Wang, W.-T., Chang, Y.-J., & Lin, S.-M. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-09115-x · Cited by 14
Bromodomain Factor 5 as a Target for Antileishmanial Drug Discovery
(2023) · doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.3c00431 · Cited by 10
Schiedel, M., McArdle, D. J. B., Padalino, G., Chan, A. K. N., Forde-Thomas, J., McDonough, M., Whiteland, H., Beckmann, M., Cookson, R., Hoffmann, K. F., et al. (2023) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c01321 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Valkó, K., Bevan, C., & Reynolds, D.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-06-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2022-2029
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1973734061
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.