The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modification of Cysteine Residues by Alkylation. A Tool in Peptide Mapping and Protein Identification
Abstract
Although mass spectrometric peptide mapping has become an established technique for the rapid identification of proteins isolated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), the results of the identification procedure can sometimes be ambiguous. Such ambiguities become increasingly prevalent for proteins isolated as mixtures or when only very small amounts of the proteins are isolated. The quality of the identification procedure can be improved by increasing the number of peptides that are extracted from the gel. Here we show that cysteine alkylation is required to ensure maximal coverage in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) peptide mapping of proteins isolated by PAGE. In the described procedure, alkylation was performed prior to electrophoresis to avoid the adventitious formation of acrylamide adducts during electrophoresis. In this way, homogeneous alkylation was obtained with three different alkylating reagents (4-vinylpyridine, iodoacetamide, acrylamide). Cysteine alkylation was also used as a tool for the identification of cysteine-containing peptides. Using a 1:1 mixture of unlabeled acrylamide and deuterium-labeled acrylamide ([2,3,3'-D3]acrylamide), the proteins of interest were alkylated prior to electrophoretic separation. Peptide mixtures produced by trypsin digestion of the resulting protein bands were analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS, and the cysteine content of the peptides was inferred from the isotopic distributions. The cysteine content information was readily obtained and used to improve the protein identification process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new regulatory motif in cell-cycle control causing specific inhibition of cyclin D/CDK4.
Serrano, M., Hannon, G. J., & Beach, D. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/366704a0 · Cited by 3,650
Cited by
Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags
Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M. H., & Aebersold, R. (1999) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/13690 · Cited by 4,683
Mass spectrometry–based proteomics turns quantitative
Ong, S.-E., & Mann, M. (2005) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio736 · Cited by 1,572
Mass Spectrometry in Proteomics
Aebersold, R., & Goodlett, D. R. (2001) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr990076h · Cited by 1,238
Chi, H., Liu, C., Yang, H., Zeng, W.-F., Wu, L., Zhou, W.-J., Wang, R.-M., Niu, X.-N., Ding, Y.-H., Zhang, Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4236 · Cited by 434
Kuipers, B. J. H., & Gruppen, H. (2007) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf070337l · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Sechi, S., & Chait, B. T.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-11-07
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 5150-5158
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2037181602
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.