Cited by 196Analytical chemistry methods developmentSurfactants and Colloidal SystemsChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions

An Acid-Induced Phase Cloud Point Separation Approach Using Anionic Surfactants for the Extraction and Preconcentration of Organic Compounds

Casero, I., Sicilia, D., Rubio, S., Pérez-Bendito, D.·1999·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

The acid-induced liquid−liquid phase separation of anionic surfactants in aqueous solutions, and its applicability to cloud point extraction methodology, were examined. The phase diagrams obtained (e.g., [HCl] vs [surfactant]) consisted of three regions: a homogeneous liquid region, two coexisting isotropic phases, and a solid region. The breadth of each region was found to depend on the surfactant structure. The behavior of each phase was also examined in relation to temperature and added salts. The anionic surfactants investigated were sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid (SDBSA), sodium dodecanesulfonic acid (SDSA), and sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate (Aerosol OT). The use of anionic surfactant-mediated phase separations provided very high extraction efficiencies (80−100%) for pyrene in aqueous samples and various PAHs in a certified reference material (dried sewage sludge). The preconcentration factor achieved was found to be a function of both surfactant and acid concentrations. Theoretical preconcentration factors as high as 230 can be reached with Aerosol OT. Alkyl surfactants were used to preconcentrate polar PAHs and progesterone prior to their determination by HPLC. The lack of an aromatic moiety in the structure of the surfactants and their ionic character enables complete resolution of their chromatographic peak from those of the analytes. The ability of anionic surfactants to extract thermally labile compounds was confirmed by extracting vitamin E at 10 °C with recoveries of about 80−85%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac990106g

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of anionic surfactants as effective extractant in cloud-point extraction separation often requires salts and pH adjustments.

    “In addition, the use of anionic surfactants as effective extractant in the cloud-point extraction separation often requires of salts and adjustments of pH [20,21].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Casero, I., Sicilia, D., Rubio, S., & Pérez-Bendito, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Córdoba (ES)
  • Analytical Chemistry Division, Faculty of Sciences, University of Córdoba, Avda San Alberto Magno s/n, E-14004 Córdoba, Spain
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
1999-09-11
Volume
71
Issue
20
Pages
4519-4526
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2033487202
Cited by
196
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
Keywords
cloud point extraction, anionic surfactants, liquid-liquid phase separation, preconcentration, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, pyrene, sewage sludge, sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate, sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate, progesterone, vitamin E, thermally labile compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review