Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 528

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selectivity in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction

Saha, Paramita, Amanullah, Sk, Dey, Abhishek·2022·Accounts of Chemical Research

Abstract

Conspectus The electrocatalytic CO 2 reduction reaction (CO 2 RR) to generate fixed forms of carbons that have commercial value is a lucrative avenue to ameliorate the growing concerns about the detrimental effect of CO 2 emissions as well as to generate carbon-based feed chemicals, which are generally obtained from the petrochemical industry. The area of electrochemical CO 2 RR has seen substantial activity in the past decade, and several good catalysts have been reported. While the focus was initially on the rate and overpotential of electrocatalysis, it is gradually shifting toward the more chemically challenging issue of selectivity. CO 2 can be partially reduced to produce several C 1 products like CO, HCOOH, CH 3 OH, etc. before its complete 8e – /8H + reduction to CH 4 . In addition to that, the low-valent electron-rich metal centers deployed to activate CO 2, a Lewis acid, are prone to reduce protons, which are a substrate for CO 2 RR, leading to competing hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Similarly, the low-valent metal is prone to oxidation by atmospheric O 2 (i.e., it can catalyze the oxygen reduction reaction, ORR), necessitating strictly anaerobic conditions for CO 2 RR. Not only is the requirement of O 2 -free reaction conditions impractical, but it also leads to the release of partially reduced O 2 species such as O 2 –, H 2 O 2, etc., which are reactive and result in oxidative degradation of the catalyst. In this Account, mechanistic investigations of CO 2 RR by detecting and, often, chemically trapping and characterizing reaction intermediates are used to understand the factors that determine the selectivity in CO 2 RR. The spectroscopic data obtained from different intermediates have been identified in different CO 2 RR catalysts to develop an electronic structure selectivity relationship that is deemed to be important for deciding the selectivity of 2e – /2H + CO 2 RR. The roles played by the spin state, hydrogen bonding, and heterogenization in determining the rate and selectivity of CO 2 RR (producing only CO, only HCOOH, or only CH 4 ) are discussed using examples of both iron porphyrin and non-heme bioinspired artificial mimics. In addition, strategies are demonstrated where the competition between CO 2 RR and HER as well as CO 2 RR and ORR could be skewed overwhelmingly in favor of CO 2 RR in both cases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00678

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Metadata

Authors
Saha, P., Amanullah, S., & Dey, A.
Venue
Accounts of Chemical Research
Published
2022-01-06
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
134-144
ISSN
  • 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4898
OpenAlex
W4205993202
Cited by
528
References
46
FWCI
17.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selectivity in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00678
The paper
Saha, P., Amanullah, S., & Dey, A. (2022). Selectivity in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00678

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.