The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Computation and Experiment: A Powerful Combination to Understand and Predict Reactivities
Abstract
Computational chemistry has become an established tool for the study of the origins of chemical phenomena and examination of molecular properties. Because of major advances in theory, hardware and software, calculations of molecular processes can nowadays be done with reasonable accuracy on a time-scale that is competitive or even faster than experiments. This overview will highlight broad applications of computational chemistry in the study of organic and organometallic reactivities, including catalytic (NHC-, Cu-, Pd-, Ni-catalyzed) and noncatalytic examples of relevance to organic synthesis. The selected examples showcase the ability of computational chemistry to rationalize and also predict reactivities of broad significance. A particular emphasis is placed on the synergistic interplay of computations and experiments. It is discussed how this approach allows one to (i) gain greater insight than the isolated techniques, (ii) inspire novel chemistry avenues, and (iii) assist in reaction development. Examples of successful rationalizations of reactivities are discussed, including the elucidation of mechanistic features (radical versus polar) and origins of stereoselectivity in NHC-catalyzed reactions as well as the rationalization of ligand effects on ligation states and selectivity in Pd- and Ni-catalyzed transformations. Beyond explaining, the synergistic interplay of computation and experiments is then discussed, showcasing the identification of the likely catalytically active species as a function of ligand, additive, and solvent in Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions. These may vary between mono- or bisphosphine-bound or even anionic Pd complexes in polar media in the presence of coordinating additives. These fundamental studies also inspired avenues in catalysis via dinuclear Pd(I) cycles. Detailed mechanistic studies supporting the direct reactivity of Pd(I)-Pd(I) with aryl halides as well as applications of air-stable dinuclear Pd(I) catalysts are discussed. Additional combined experimental and computational studies are described for alternative metals, these include the discussion of the factors that control C-H versus C-C activation in the aerobic Cu-catalyzed oxidation of ketones, and ligand and additive effects on the nature and favored oxidation state of the active catalyst in Ni-catalyzed trifluoromethylthiolations of aryl chlorides. Examples of successful computational reactivity predictions along with experimental verifications are then presented. This includes the design of a fluorinated ligand [(CF3)2P(CH2)2P(CF3)2] for the challenging reductive elimination of ArCF3 from Pd(II) as well as the guidance of substrate scope (functional group tolerance and suitable leaving group) in the Ni-catalyzed trifluoromethylthiolation of C(sp(2))-O bonds. In summary, this account aims to convey the benefits of integrating computational studies in experimental research to increase understanding of observed phenomena and guide future experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Davies, D. L., Macgregor, S. A., & McMullin, C. L. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00839 · Cited by 585
Computational Approach to Molecular Catalysis by 3d Transition Metals: Challenges and Opportunities
Vogiatzis, K. D., Polynski, M. V., Kirkland, J. K., Townsend, J., Hashemi, A., Liu, C., & Pidko, E. A. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00361 · Cited by 423
Computational Ligand Descriptors for Catalyst Design
Durand, D. J., & Fey, N. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00588 · Cited by 406
Nandy, A., Duan, C., Taylor, M. G., Liu, F., Steeves, A. H., & Kulik, H. J. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00347 · Cited by 358
KO t Bu: A Privileged Reagent for Electron Transfer Reactions?
Barham, J. P., Coulthard, G., Emery, K. J., Doni, E., Cumine, F., Nocera, G., John, M. P., Berlouis, L. E. A., McGuire, T., Tuttle, T., et al. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b03282 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Sperger, T., Sanhueza, I. A., & Schoenebeck, F.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-05-12
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1311-1319
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2368536402
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computation and Experiment: A Powerful Combination to Understand and Predict Reactivities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00068
- The paper
- Sperger, T., Sanhueza, I. A., & Schoenebeck, F. (2016). Computation and Experiment: A Powerful Combination to Understand and Predict Reactivities. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00068
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.