Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 135Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applicationsnanoparticles nucleation surface interactionsQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Direct Observation of Interactions between Nanoparticles and Nanoparticle Self-Assembly in Solution

Tan, Shu Fen, Chee, See Wee, Lin, Guanhua, Mirsaidov, Utkur·2017·Accounts of Chemical Research

Abstract

Hierarchically organized nanoparticles (NPs) possess unique properties and are relevant to various technological applications. An important "bottom-up" strategy for building such hierarchical nanostructures is to guide the individual NPs into ordered nanoarchitectures using intermolecular interactions and external forces. However, our current understanding of the nanoscale interactions that govern such self-assembly processes usually relies on post-synthesis/assembly or indirect characterization. Theoretical models that can derive these interactions are presently constrained to systems with only a few particles or on short time scales. Hence, except for a number of special cases, a description that captures the detailed mechanisms of NP self-assembly still eludes us. By imaging the assembly of NPs in solution with subnanometer resolution and in real-time, in situ liquid cell transmission electron microscopy (LC-TEM) can identify previously unknown intermediate stages and improve our understanding of such processes. Here, we review recent studies where we explored NP self-assembly at different organization length scales using LC-TEM: (1) we followed the transformation of atoms into crystalline NPs in solution, (2) we highlighted the role of solvation forces on interaction dynamics between NPs, and (3) we described the assembly dynamics of NPs in solution. In the case of nanocrystal nucleation, we identified the existence of three distinct steps that lead to the formation of crystalline nuclei in solution. These steps are spinodal decomposition of the precursor solution into solute-rich and solute-poor liquid phases, nucleation of amorphous clusters within the solute-rich liquid phase, followed by crystallization of these amorphous clusters into crystalline NPs. The next question we ask is how NPs interact in solution once they form. It turns out that the hydration layer surrounding each NP acts as a repulsive barrier that prevents NPs from readily attaching to each other due to attractive vdW forces. Consequently, two interacting NPs form a metastable pair separated by their one water molecule thick hydration shell and they undergo attachment only when this water between them is drained. Next, we explore the self-assembly of many NP systems where the formation of linear chains from spherical NPs or nanorods (NRs) is mediated by linker molecules. At low linker concentration, both spherical NPs and NRs tend to form linear chains because of the need to reduce electrostatic repulsion between NP building blocks. When the concentration of linkers is increased, the attachment of NPs is no longer linear. For example, we find that two NRs undergo side-to-side assembly due to decreased electrostatic repulsion and the anisotropic distribution of linkers on NR surfaces at high linker concentration. Lastly, we look at the formation of NP nanorings directed by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) nanodroplets in water. Our study shows that nanoring assemblies form via sequential attachment of NPs to binding sites located along the circumference of the EDTA nanodroplet, followed by rearrangement and reorientation of the attached NPs. Our approach based on real-time visualization of nanoscale processes not only reveals all the intermediate steps of NP assembly, but also provides quantitative description on the interactions between nanoscale objects in solution.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00063

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Israelachvili J., 2011, Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 253

Cited by

See all 135

Metadata

Authors
Tan, S. F., Chee, S. W., Lin, G., & Mirsaidov, U.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Mirsaidov, Utkur
Venue
Accounts of Chemical Research
Published
2017-05-09
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
1303-1312
ISSN
  • 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4898
OpenAlex
W2614060490
Cited by
133
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 14
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Accounts of Chemical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education - Singapore (MOE2015-T2-1-07)
  • National University of Singapore (NUSYIA-FY14-P17)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Keywords
nanoparticle self-assembly, nanoparticle interactions, liquid cell electron microscopy, in situ imaging, nanocrystal nucleation, spinodal decomposition, solvation forces, hydration shell, van der Waals interactions, electrostatic repulsion, hierarchical nanostructures, amorphous clusters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.