The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synthesis and Applications of Boronate Affinity Materials: From Class Selectivity to Biomimetic Specificity
Open accessAbstract
Due to the complexity of biological systems and samples, specific capture and targeting of certain biomolecules is critical in much biological research and many applications. cis-Diol-containing biomolecules, a large family of important compounds including glycoproteins, saccharides, nucleosides, nucleotides, and so on, play essential roles in biological systems. As boronic acids can reversibly bind with cis-diols, boronate affinity materials (BAMs) have gained increasing attention in recent years. However, real-world applications of BAMs are often severely hampered by three bottleneck issues, including nonbiocompatible binding pH, weak affinity, and difficulty in selectivity manipulation. Therefore, solutions to these issues and knowledge about the factors that influence the binding properties are of significant importance. These issues have been well solved by our group in past years. Our solutions started from the synthesis and screening of boronic acid ligands with chemical moieties favorable for binding at neutral and acidic pH. To avoid tedious synthesis routes, we proposed a straightforward strategy called teamed boronate affinity, which permitted facile preparation of BAMs with strong binding at neutral pH. To enhance the affinity, we confirmed that multivalent binding could significantly enhance the affinity toward glycoproteins. More interestingly, we observed that molecular interactions could be significantly enhanced by confinement within nanoscale spaces. To improve the selectivity, we investigated interactions that govern the selectivity and their interplays. We then proposed a set of strategies for selectivity manipulation, which proved to be useful guidelines for not only the design of new BAMs but also the selection of binding conditions. Applications in metabolomic analysis, glycoproteomic analysis, and aptamer selection well demonstrated the great potential of the prepared BAMs. Molecular imprinting is an important methodology for creating affinity materials with antibody-like binding properties. Boronate affinity-based covalent imprinting is a pioneering approach in molecular imprinting, but only a few cases of successful imprinting of glycoproteins by this method were reported. With sound understanding of boronate affinity, we developed two facile and generally applicable boronate affinity-based molecular imprinting approaches. The resulting boronate affinity molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) exhibited dramatically improved binding properties, including biocompatible binding pH range, enhanced affinity, improved specificity, and superb tolerance to interference. In terms of nanoconfinement effect, we explained why the binding pH range was widened and why the affinity was enhanced. The excellent binding properties made boronate affinity MIPs appealing alternatives to antibodies in promising applications such as disease diagnosis, cancer-cell targeting, and single-cell analysis. In this Account, we survey the key aspects of BAMs, the efforts we made to solve these issues, and the connections between imprinted and nonimprinted BAMs. Through this survey, we wish to pave a sound fundamental basis of the dependence of binding properties of BAMs on the nature and structure of the ligands and the supporting materials, which can facilitate the development and applications of BAMs. We also briefly sketch remaining challenges and directions for future development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tuerk, C., & Gold, L. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2200121 · Cited by 10,405
In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands
Ellington, A. D., & Szostak, J. W. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/346818a0 · Cited by 9,812
Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry: Applications, Theory and Instrumentation
(2006) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470027318 · Cited by 7,403
Wulff, G. (1995) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English · doi:10.1002/anie.199518121 · Cited by 2,373
Drug assay using antibody mimics made by molecular imprinting
Vlatakis, G., Andersson, L. I., Müller, R., & Mosbach, K. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361645a0 · Cited by 1,755
Interface-Confined Ferrous Centers for Catalytic Oxidation
Fu, Q., Li, W.-X., Yao, Y., Liu, H., Su, H.-Y., Ma, D., Gu, X.-K., Chen, L., Wang, Z., Zhang, H., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188267 · Cited by 1,017
Template-imprinted nanostructured surfaces for protein recognition
Shi, H., Tsai, W.-B., Garrison, M. D., Ferrari, S., & Ratner, B. D. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19267 · Cited by 684
Li, D., Chen, Y., & Liu, Z. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00013k · Cited by 586
Self-citationSelective Protein Capture by Epitope Imprinting
Nishino, H., Huang, C., & Shea, K. J. (2006) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200503760 · Cited by 470
Dowlut, M., & Hall, D. G. (2006) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja057798c · Cited by 434
Cited by
Ding, S., Lyu, Z., Niu, X., Zhou, Y., Liu, D., Falahati, M., Du, D., & Lin, Y. (2020) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2019.111830 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Z., & He, H.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-08-29
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2185-2193
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2750879099
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 20.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthesis and Applications of Boronate Affinity Materials: From Class Selectivity to Biomimetic Specificity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00179
- The paper
- Liu, Z., & He, H. (2017). Synthesis and Applications of Boronate Affinity Materials: From Class Selectivity to Biomimetic Specificity. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.