Cited by 9Radioactive element chemistry and processingAnalytical chemistry methods developmentAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors

Reversible Hydrophobic Deep Eutectic Solvent-Based Uranyl-Sensing Optode Film in Aqueous Streams: Color Transformation and Reusability

Shrivastava, Komal C., Kumar, K. S. Ajish, Sengupta, Arijit, Ali, Sheikh Musharaf, Ramkumar, Jayshree·2024·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

A hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent (HDES)-based optode was designed for the preconcentration and determination of the UO 2 2+ ion in aqueous media using spectroscopic techniques [energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) and solid-state absorption]. The optode was developed by incorporation of HDES (tri- n -octyl phosphine oxide and decanoic acid in an equimolar ratio), tri-(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate, and 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-diethylaminophenol into a cellulose triacetate matrix. Characterization studies were carried out using different techniques to understand the roles of HDES as a plasticizer, UO 2 2+ extractant, and Br-PADAP immobilizer. Uptake studies revealed that the optimal pH was 3 and sorption followed the type II adsorption isotherm. Uranium in the U-sorbed optode can be directly analyzed over a large concentration range of 0.021 × 10 –3 –2.1 × 10 –3 Mol L –1 using EDXRF. The optode film exhibited a linear dynamic range of 0.84 × 10 –6 –84 × 10 –6 Mol L –1 for uranium, with a lowest limit of detection of 0.084 × 10 –6 Mol L –1 by colorimetric analysis. This optode-based method was employed for seawater analysis for its UO 2 2+ concentration without any matrix separation, and the concentration was found to be 1.30 ± 0.06 × 10 –8 Mol L –1 . The optode exhibited better selectivity for UO 2 2+ in the presence of various cations including Sr 2+ and Cs + in an aqueous medium. Compared to other prevailing optical sensors, this optode performed better in terms of key factors like pH, equilibration time, reusability, and detection limit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01357

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shrivastava, K. C., Kumar, K. S. A., Sengupta, A., Ali, S. M., & Ramkumar, J.
Affiliations
  • Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (IN)
  • Chemical Engineering Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, India
Corresponding author
Shrivastava, Komal C.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2024-07-23
Volume
96
Issue
31
Pages
12658-12666
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W4400932678
Cited by
9
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Radioactive element chemistry and processing
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Bioengineering › Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
Keywords
optode, hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents, uranyl ion, colorimetric sensor, cellulose triacetate films, trioctylphosphine oxide, capric acid, 5-Br-PADAP, sorption, adsorption isotherms, seawater analysis, preconcentration, plasticizers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review