The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Porphyrin-Encapsulated Metal–Organic Frameworks as Mimetic Catalysts for Electrochemical DNA Sensing via Allosteric Switch of Hairpin DNA
Abstract
A sensitive electrochemical sensor is designed for DNA detection based on mimetic catalysis of metal-organic framework (MOF) and allosteric switch of hairpin DNA. The functional MOFs are synthesized as signal probes by a one-pot encapsulation of iron(III) meso-5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin chloride (FeTCPP) into a prototypal MOF, HKUST-1(Cu), and sequentially conjugated with streptavidin (SA) as a recognition element. The resulting FeTCPP@MOF composites can mimetically catalyze the oxidation of o-phenylenediamine (o-PD) to 2,2'-diaminoazobenzene, which is a good electrochemical indicator for signal readout. The presence of target DNA introduces the allosteric switch of hairpin DNA to form SA aptamer, and thus, FeTCPP@MOF-SA probe is brought on the electrode surface via the specific recognition between SA and the corresponding aptamer, resulting in the enhancement of electrochemical signal. The "signal-on" electrochemical sensor can detect target DNA down to 0.48 fM with the linear range of 10 fM to 10 nM. Moreover, the MOF-based electrochemical sensor exhibits acceptable selectivity against even a single mismatched DNA and good feasibility in complex serum matrixes. This strategy opens up a new direction of porphyrin-functionalized MOF for signal transduction in electrochemical biosensing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles
Gao, L., Zhuang, J., Nie, L., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Gu, N., Wang, T., Feng, J., Yang, D., Perrett, S., et al. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.260 · Cited by 7,483
He, C., Lu, K., Liu, D., & Lin, W. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja4098862 · Cited by 885
Cited by
Porphyrinoids for Chemical Sensor Applications
Paolesse, R., Nardis, S., Monti, D., Stefanelli, M., & Di Natale, C. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00361 · Cited by 874
Metal–Organic Framework Nanoparticles
Wang, S., McGuirk, C. M., d'Aquino, A., Mason, J. A., & Mirkin, C. A. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201800202 · Cited by 833
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Food Safety
Wang, P.-L., Xie, L.-H., Joseph, E. A., Li, J.-R., Su, X.-O., & Zhou, H.-C. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00257 · Cited by 533
The Applications of Metal−Organic Frameworks in Electrochemical Sensors
Liu, L., Zhou, Y., Liu, S., & Xu, M. (2018) · ChemElectroChem · doi:10.1002/celc.201700931 · Cited by 409
Metal–organic framework composites and their electrochemical applications
Xue, Y., Zheng, S., Xue, H., & Pang, H. (2019) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c8ta12178h · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Ling, P., Lei, J., Zhang, L., & Ju, H.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-03-13
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3957-3963
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1996869669
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Porphyrin-Encapsulated Metal–Organic Frameworks as Mimetic Catalysts for Electrochemical DNA Sensing via Allosteric Switch of Hairpin DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00001
- The paper
- Ling, P., Lei, J., Zhang, L., & Ju, H. (2015). Porphyrin-Encapsulated Metal–Organic Frameworks as Mimetic Catalysts for Electrochemical DNA Sensing via Allosteric Switch of Hairpin DNA. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.