Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 830

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward Merging Untargeted and Targeted Methods in Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics and Lipidomics

Cajka, Tomas, Fiehn, Oliver·2016·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTToward Merging Untargeted and Targeted Methods in Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics and LipidomicsTomas Cajka† and Oliver Fiehn*†‡View Author Information† UC Davis Genome Center−Metabolomics, University of California Davis, 451 Health Sciences Drive, Davis, California 95616, United States‡ King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Science, Biochemistry Department, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia*Phone: +1-530-754-8258. Fax: +1-530-754-9658. E-mail: [email protected]Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 1, 524–545Publication Date (Web):December 4, 2015Publication History Published online16 December 2015Published inissue 5 January 2016https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04491https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04491review-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2015 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views20448Altmetric-Citations571LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Ions,Lipidomics,Lipids,Metabolism,Metabolomics Get e-Alerts

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04491

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 830

Metadata

Authors
Cajka, T., & Fiehn, O.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2015-12-16
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
524-545
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2188690658
Cited by
830
References
5
FWCI
22.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward Merging Untargeted and Targeted Methods in Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics and Lipidomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04491
The paper
Cajka, T., & Fiehn, O. (2016). Toward Merging Untargeted and Targeted Methods in Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics and Lipidomics. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04491

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.