The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational Prediction of Electron Ionization Mass Spectra to Assist in GC/MS Compound Identification
Abstract
We describe a tool, competitive fragmentation modeling for electron ionization (CFM-EI) that, given a chemical structure (e.g., in SMILES or InChI format), computationally predicts an electron ionization mass spectrum (EI-MS) (i.e., the type of mass spectrum commonly generated by gas chromatography mass spectrometry). The predicted spectra produced by this tool can be used for putative compound identification, complementing measured spectra in reference databases by expanding the range of compounds able to be considered when availability of measured spectra is limited. The tool extends CFM-ESI, a recently developed method for computational prediction of electrospray tandem mass spectra (ESI-MS/MS), but unlike CFM-ESI, CFM-EI can handle odd-electron ions and isotopes and incorporates an artificial neural network. Tests on EI-MS data from the NIST database demonstrate that CFM-EI is able to model fragmentation likelihoods in low-resolution EI-MS data, producing predicted spectra whose dot product scores are significantly better than full enumeration "bar-code" spectra. CFM-EI also outperformed previously reported results for MetFrag, MOLGEN-MS, and Mass Frontier on one compound identification task. It also outperformed MetFrag in a range of other compound identification tasks involving a much larger data set, containing both derivatized and nonderivatized compounds. While replicate EI-MS measurements of chemical standards are still a more accurate point of comparison, CFM-EI's predictions provide a much-needed alternative when no reference standard is available for measurement. CFM-EI is available at https://sourceforge.net/projects/cfm-id/ for download and http://cfmid.wishartlab.com as a web service.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sumner, L. W., Amberg, A., Barrett, D., Beale, M. H., Beger, R., Daykin, C. A., Fan, T. W.-M., Fiehn, O., Goodacre, R., Griffin, J. L., et al. (2007) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-007-0082-2 · Cited by 5,368
Searching molecular structure databases with tandem mass spectra using CSI:FingerID
Dührkop, K., Shen, H., Meusel, M., Rousu, J., & Böcker, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1509788112 · Cited by 1,190
Optimization and testing of mass spectral library search algorithms for compound identification
Stein, S. E., & Scott, D. R. (1994) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1016/1044-0305(94)87009-8 · Cited by 882
In silico fragmentation for computer assisted identification of metabolite mass spectra
Wolf, S., Schmidt, S., Müller-Hannemann, M., & Neumann, S. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-148 · Cited by 698
Cited by
DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018
Wishart, D. S., Feunang, Y. D., Guo, A. C., Lo, E. J., Marcu, A., Grant, J. R., Sajed, T., Johnson, D., Li, C., Sayeeda, Z., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1037 · Cited by 8,404
Self-citationHMDB 4.0: the human metabolome database for 2018
Wishart, D. S., Feunang, Y. D., Marcu, A., Guo, A. C., Liang, K., Vázquez-Fresno, R., Sajed, T., Johnson, D., Li, C., Karu, N., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1089 · Cited by 3,438
Self-citationWater Analysis: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues
Richardson, S. D., & Ternes, T. A. (2018) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04577 · Cited by 657
Identifying metabolites by integrating metabolome databases with mass spectrometry cheminformatics
Lai, Z., Tsugawa, H., Wohlgemuth, G., Mehta, S., Mueller, M., Zheng, Y., Ogiwara, A., Meissen, J., Showalter, M., Takeuchi, K., et al. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4512 · Cited by 560
Djoumbou-Feunang, Y., Fiamoncini, J., Gil-de-la-Fuente, A., Greiner, R., Manach, C., & Wishart, D. S. (2019) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-018-0324-5 · Cited by 508
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, F., Pon, A., Greiner, R., & Wishart, D.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-07-21
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 7689-7697
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2462785116
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational Prediction of Electron Ionization Mass Spectra to Assist in GC/MS Compound Identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01622
- The paper
- Allen, F., Pon, A., Greiner, R., & Wishart, D. (2016). Computational Prediction of Electron Ionization Mass Spectra to Assist in GC/MS Compound Identification. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01622
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.