Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 348

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

21 Tesla FT-ICR Mass Spectrometer for Ultrahigh-Resolution Analysis of Complex Organic Mixtures

Smith, Donald F., Podgorski, David C., Rodgers, Ryan P., Blakney, Greg T., Hendrickson, Christopher L.·2018·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

We describe complex organic mixture analysis by 21 tesla (T) Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS). Ultrahigh mass-resolving power ( m /Δ m 50% > 2 700 000 at m / z 400) and mass accuracy (80 ppb rms) enable resolution and confident identification of tens of thousands of unique elemental compositions. We demonstrate 2.2-fold higher mass-resolving power, 2.6-fold better mass measurement accuracy, and 1.3-fold more assigned molecular formulas compared to our custom-built, state-of-the-art 9.4 T FT-ICR mass spectrometer for petroleum and dissolved organic matter (DOM) analyses. Analysis of a heavy petroleum distillate exemplifies the need for ultrahigh-performance mass spectrometry (49 040 assigned molecular formulas for 21 T versus 29 012 for 9.4 T) and extends the identification of previously unresolved O o, S s O o, and NO o classes. Mass selective ion accumulation (20 Thompson isolation) of an asphalt volcano sample yields 462 resolved mass spectral peaks at m / z 677 and reveals previously unresolved C c H h N n O o S s mass differences at high mass ( m / z > 600). Similar performance gains are realized in the analysis of dissolved organic matter, where doubly charged O o species are resolved from singly charged SO o species, which requires a mass-resolving power greater than 1 400 000 (at m / z 600). This direct comparison reveals the continued need for higher mass-resolving power and better mass accuracy for comprehensive molecular characterization of the most complex organic mixtures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04159

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 348

Metadata

Authors
Smith, D. F., Podgorski, D. C., Rodgers, R. P., Blakney, G. T., & Hendrickson, C. L.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2018-01-05
Volume
90
Issue
3
Pages
2041-2047
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2782030392
Cited by
348
References
42
FWCI
13.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 21 Tesla FT-ICR Mass Spectrometer for Ultrahigh-Resolution Analysis of Complex Organic Mixtures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04159
The paper
Smith, D. F., Podgorski, D. C., Rodgers, R. P., Blakney, G. T., & Hendrickson, C. L. (2018). 21 Tesla FT-ICR Mass Spectrometer for Ultrahigh-Resolution Analysis of Complex Organic Mixtures. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04159

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.