Cited by 43Electrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsElectrostatics and Colloid Interactions

In Situ Measurement of the Size Distribution and Concentration of Insulating Particles by Electrochemical Collision on Hemispherical Ultramicroelectrodes

Deng, Zejun, Elattar, Ridha, Maroun, Fouad, Renault, Christophe·2018·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

One of the greatest limitations in electrochemical collision/nanoimpact methods is the inability to quantify the size of colliding species due to the uneven current distribution on a disk ultramicroelectrode UME (so-called edge effect). This phenomenon arises since radial diffusion is greater at the edge than the center of the active electrode surface. One method of solving this problem is fabrication of a hemispherical UME. We describe the fabrication of a hemispherical Hg UME on a disk UME by a solution-based electrochemical method, chronocoulometry. The use of hemispherical Hg UME to detect collisions of individual amine-functionalized polystyrene beads removes the "edge effect" and enables simultaneous measurements of the concentration and the size distribution of colloids in suspension. Using finite element simulations, we deduce a quantitative relation between the distribution of current step size and the size distribution of the bead. The frequency of collision measured for a given size of bead is then converted into a concentration (in mol/L) by a quantification of the relative contributions of migration and diffusion for each size of bead. Under our experimental conditions (low concentration of supporting electrolyte), migration dominates the flux of bead. The average size of polystyrene beads of 0.5 and 1 μm radius obtained by electrochemistry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) differs by only -8% and -9%, respectively. The total concentration of polystyrene bea…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03550

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The accuracy of particle size distribution is highly improved by carrying out single-impact electrochemistry with a hemispherical Hg UME than with a disk Pt UME.

    “For instance, the accuracy of particle size distribution is highly improved by carrying out single-impact electrochemistry with a hemispherical Hg UME than a disk Pt UME [26].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deng, Z., Elattar, R., Maroun, F., & Renault, C.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Renault, Christophe
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2018-10-04
Volume
90
Issue
21
Pages
12923-12929
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2895335939
Cited by
43
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE09-0034-01)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • China Scholarship Council (201706370055)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions
Keywords
colloidal particles, particle size distribution, particle concentration, edge effects, radial diffusion, chronocoulometry, polystyrene microspheres, finite element analysis, electrokinetic migration, in situ measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review