Cited by 229Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Characterization and optimization of multiplexed quantitative analyses using high-field asymmetric-waveform ion mobility mass spectrometry

Open access
Schweppe, Devin K., Prasad, Satendra, Belford, Michael W., Navarrete-Perea, José, Bailey, Derek J., Huguet, Romain, Jedrychowski, Mark P., Rad, Ramin +7 more·2019·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Multiplexed, isobaric tagging methods are powerful techniques to increase throughput, precision, and accuracy in quantitative proteomics. The dynamic range and accuracy of quantitation, however, can be limited by coisolation of tag-containing peptides that release reporter ions and conflate quantitative measurements across precursors. Methods to alleviate these effects often lead to the loss of protein and peptide identifications through online or offline filtering of interference containing spectra. To alleviate this effect, high-Field Asymmetric-waveform Ion Mobility Spectroscopy (FAIMS) has been proposed as a method to reduce precursor coisolation and improve the accuracy and dynamic range of multiplex quantitation. Here we tested the use of FAIMS to improve quantitative accuracy using previously established TMT-based interference standards (triple-knockout [TKO] and H uman- Y east P rot e omics R esource [HYPER]). We observed that FAIMS robustly improved the quantitative accuracy of both high-resolution MS 2 (HRMS 2 ) and synchronous precursor selection MS 3 (SPS-MS 3 )-based methods without sacrificing protein identifications. We further optimized and characterized the main factors that enable robust use of FAIMS for multiplexed quantitation. We highlight these factors and provide method recommendations to take advantage of FAIMS technology to improve isobaric-tag-quantification moving forward.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05399

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schweppe, D. K., Prasad, S., Belford, M. W., Navarrete-Perea, J., Bailey, D. J., Huguet, R., Jedrychowski, M. P., Rad, R., McAlister, G., Abbatiello, S. E., Woulters, E. R., Zabrouskov, V., Dunyach, J.-J., Paulo, J. A., & Gygi, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Thermo Scientific LSMS, San Jose, California 95134, United States
Corresponding author
  • Schweppe, Devin K.
  • Gygi, Steven P.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2019-01-23
Volume
91
Issue
6
Pages
4010-4016
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2912956724
Cited by
229
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 6
FWCI
9.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U24 HG006673 07)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K01 DK098285)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
FAIMS, isobaric tagging, Trail Making Test, dynamic range, quantitative accuracy, method optimization
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasm Proteins, Peptides, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mass Spectrometry, Proteome, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Proteomics, HCT116 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review