Cited by 29Molecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsScientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Storage Stability of Solutions of DNA Standards

Baoutina, Anna, Bhat, Somanath, Partis, Lina, Emslie, Kerry R.·2019·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

High accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility of genetic analyses in various applications require optimized and validated protocols and standards. Optimal procedures for storing the genetic material extracted from biological samples are equally important. In this study, we investigated the stability of dilute (4000 cp/μL, nominal concentration, equivalent to 0.02 ng/mL) DNA solutions stored at 4, -20, and -80 °C in the presence or absence of nucleic acid carriers. As representative examples, we used different formulations of a linearized plasmid DNA solution considered for characterization as reference materials (RMs) for specific applications. Employing droplet digital PCR, a highly accurate and precise method for quantification of nucleic acid not requiring a calibrant, we demonstrated that inclusion of a carrier nucleic acid in the formulation (at 50 ng/μL) improved the plasmid stability at -20 and -80 °C. For the case of a DNA standard used in real-time PCR assays for human erythropoietin gene, cDNA or transcript, we found that inclusion of yeast RNA in the formulation was preferred over salmon testes DNA as it had no effect on PCR amplification and provided the lowest relative expanded uncertainty for the characterized RM. RNA background may also be preferred as it is applicable to a broader range of DNA RMs. Our findings are important in production of reliable, stable DNA standards, including DNA RMs. These results can be used when selecting protocols for stable storage of DNA either extracted from biological samples or synthesized in a laboratory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02334

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 29

Authors
Baoutina, A., Bhat, S., Partis, L., & Emslie, K. R.
Affiliations
National Measurement Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Baoutina, Anna
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2019-08-29
Volume
91
Issue
19
Pages
12268-12274
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2971180510
Cited by
29
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Anti-Doping Agency
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
plasmid DNA, cryopreservation, droplet digital PCR, erythropoietin gene, yeast RNA, relative expanded uncertainty
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA, Erythropoietin, Freezing, Humans, Plasmids, Quality Control, Reference Standards, Salmon, Temperature, Reproducibility of Results, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review