Storage Stability of Solutions of DNA Standards
Abstract
High accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility of genetic analyses in various applications require optimized and validated protocols and standards. Optimal procedures for storing the genetic material extracted from biological samples are equally important. In this study, we investigated the stability of dilute (4000 cp/μL, nominal concentration, equivalent to 0.02 ng/mL) DNA solutions stored at 4, -20, and -80 °C in the presence or absence of nucleic acid carriers. As representative examples, we used different formulations of a linearized plasmid DNA solution considered for characterization as reference materials (RMs) for specific applications. Employing droplet digital PCR, a highly accurate and precise method for quantification of nucleic acid not requiring a calibrant, we demonstrated that inclusion of a carrier nucleic acid in the formulation (at 50 ng/μL) improved the plasmid stability at -20 and -80 °C. For the case of a DNA standard used in real-time PCR assays for human erythropoietin gene, cDNA or transcript, we found that inclusion of yeast RNA in the formulation was preferred over salmon testes DNA as it had no effect on PCR amplification and provided the lowest relative expanded uncertainty for the characterized RM. RNA background may also be preferred as it is applicable to a broader range of DNA RMs. Our findings are important in production of reliable, stable DNA standards, including DNA RMs. These results can be used when selecting protocols for stable storage of DNA either extracted from biological samples or synthesized in a laboratory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Storage in TE buffer was the only other method to successfully stabilize DNA at room temperature.
“We also investigated storage in TE buffer (Figure S3, Supporting Information), which was the only other method to successfully stabilize DNA at room temperature.[34,35]”
From Integrating DNA Encapsulates and Digital Microfluidics for Automated Data Storage in DNA (2022) · cites this paper as [34]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Baoutina, A., Bhat, S., Partis, L., & Emslie, K. R.
- Affiliations
- National Measurement Institute (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Baoutina, Anna
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-08-29
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 12268-12274
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2971180510
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- World Anti-Doping Agency
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Keywords
- plasmid DNA, cryopreservation, droplet digital PCR, erythropoietin gene, yeast RNA, relative expanded uncertainty
- MeSH terms
- Animals, DNA, Erythropoietin, Freezing, Humans, Plasmids, Quality Control, Reference Standards, Salmon, Temperature, Reproducibility of Results, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review