Cited by 125

Multi‐Attribute Method for Quality Control of Therapeutic Proteins

Rogstad, Sarah, Yan, Haoheng, Wang, Xiaoshi, Powers, David, Brorson, Kurt, Damdinsuren, Bazarragchaa, Lee, Sau·2019·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Recent advances in high resolution mass spectrometry (MS) instrumentation and semi-automated software have led to a push toward the use of MS-based methods for quality control (QC) testing of therapeutic proteins in a cGMP environment. The approach that is most commonly being proposed for this purpose is known as the multi-attribute method (MAM). MAM is a promising approach that provides some distinct benefits compared to conventional methods currently used for QC testing of protein therapeutics, such as CEX, HILIC, and CE-SDS. Because MS-based methods have not been regularly used in this context in the past, new scientific and regulatory questions should be addressed prior to the final stages of implementation. We have categorized these questions into four major aspects for MAM implementation in a cGMP environment for both new and existing products: risk assessment, method validation, capabilities and specificities of the New Peak Detection (NPD) feature, and comparisons to conventional methods. This perspective outlines considerations for each of these main points and suggests approaches to help address potential issues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03808

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogstad, S., Yan, H., Wang, X., Powers, D., Brorson, K., Damdinsuren, B., & Lee, S.
Affiliations
  • Office of Testing and Research, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, CDER, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States
  • Office of Biotechnology Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, CDER, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2019-10-16
Volume
91
Issue
22
Pages
14170-14177
ISSN
  • 0003-2700
  • 1520-6882
Cited by
125
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review