Cited by 55Origins and Evolution of LifeRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

A Kinetic Model of Nonenzymatic RNA Polymerization by Cytidine-5′-phosphoro-2-aminoimidazolide

Open access
Walton, Travis, Szostak, Jack W.·2017·Biochemistry

Abstract

The nonenzymatic polymerization of RNA may have enabled copying of functional sequences during the origin of life. Recent progress utilizing 5′-phosphoro-2-aminoimidazole activation has reinvigorated the possibility of using nonenzymatic RNA polymerization for copying arbitrary sequences. However, the reasons why 2-aminoimidazole (AI) is a superior activation group remain unclear. Here we report that the predominant mechanism of polymerization using cytidine-5′-phosphoro-2-aminoimidazolide (Cp*) involves a 2-aminoimidazolium-bridged dinucleotide (Cp*pC) intermediate. To explore the role of this intermediate, we first identify and quantify four reactions involving the synthesis and breakdown of Cp*pC that occur in the absence of the primer–template duplex. We then analyze the dependence of the rate of polymerization on the concentration of the Cp*pC intermediate in the presence and absence of the competitive inhibitor Cp. We also show that the contribution of the monomer Cp* to the polymerization rate is negligible under our primer extension conditions. Finally, we use the experimentally determined rate constants of these reactions to develop a kinetic model that helps explain the changing rate of nonenzymatic RNA polymerization over time. Our model accounts for the concentration of Cp*pC formed by Cp* under primer extension conditions. The model does not completely account for the decline in polymerization rate observed over long times, which indicates that additional important inhibitory processes have not yet been identified. Our results suggest that the superiority of 2-aminoimidazole over the traditional 2-methylimidazole activation is mostly due to the higher level of accumulation of the imidazolium-bridged intermediate under primer extension conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00792

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The slow ligation is explained by primer extension with monomers proceeding through the highly reactive imidazolium-bridged dinucleotide intermediate.

    “This is now explained by the fact that primer extension with monomers proceeds through the highly reactive imidazolium-bridged dinucleotide intermediate discussed above”

    From Protocells and RNA Self-Replication (2018) · cites this paper as Walton and Szostak 2017

    The Conclusions (page not available) state that primer extension with activated cytidine monomers predominantly involves reaction with the imidazolium-bridged dinucleotide Cp*pC, whose reactivity is enhanced relative to the monomer. The cited passages do not explain slow ligation or establish that this mechanism is the reason ligation is slow. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • All detectable primer extension with 2-aminoimidazole (2AI)-activated monomers occurs via the 2-aminoimidazolium intermediate and not through direct reaction of a primer with an activated monomer.

    “all detectable primer extension occurs via the 2-aminoimidazolium intermediate and not through the reaction of a primer with an activated monomer”

    From Protocells and RNA Self-Replication (2018) · cites this paper as Walton and Szostak 2017

  • The catalytic effect reflects, at least in part, the greater stability of the 2-aminoimidazolium-bridged dinucleotide intermediate compared with the relatively unstable 2-methylimidazolium intermediate.

    “This effect is now understood to reflect, at least in part, the greater stability of the 2-aminoimidazolium-bridged dinucleotide intermediate compared with the relatively unstable 2-methylimidazolium intermediate.”

    From Protocells and RNA Self-Replication (2018) · cites this paper as Walton and Szostak 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Robertson M. P.; Joyce G. F. (2012) The origins of the RNA world. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 4, a003608 10.1101/cshperspect.a003608. PMC3331698 20739415 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Orgel L. E. (2004) Prebiotic chemistry and the origin of the RNA world. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 39, 99– 123. 10.1080/10409230490460765. 15217990 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Patel B. H.; Percivalle C.; Ritson D. J.; Duffy C. D.; Sutherland J. D. (2015) Common origins of RNA, protein and lipid precursors in a cyanosulfidic protometabolism. Nat. Chem. 7, 301– 307. 10.1038/nchem.2202. 25803468 PMC4568310 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Heuberger B. D.; Pal A.; Del Frate F.; Topkar V. V.; Szostak J. W. (2015) Replacing uridine with 2-thiouridine enhances the rate and fidelity of nonenzymatic RNA primer extension. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 2769– 2775. 10.1021/jacs.5b00445. 25654265 PMC4985000 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Larsen A. T.; Fahrenbach A. C.; Sheng J.; Pian J.; Szostak J. W. (2015) Thermodynamic insights into 2-thiouridine-enhanced RNA hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 7675– 7687. 10.1093/nar/gkv761. 26240387 PMC4652770 · DOI
  6. He C.; Gállego I.; Laughlin B.; Grover M. A.; Hud N. V. (2017) A viscous solvent enables information transfer from gene-length nucleic acids in a model prebiotic replication cycle,. Nat. Chem. 9, 318– 324. 10.1038/nchem.2628. 28338690 · DOI
  7. Prywes N.; Blain J. C.; Del Frate F.; Szostak J. W. (2016) Nonenzymatic copying of RNA templates containing all four letters is catalyzed by activated oligonucleotides. eLife 5, e17756 10.7554/eLife.17756. 27351102 PMC4959843 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Li L.; Prywes N.; Tam C. P.; O’Flaherty D. K.; Lelyveld V. S.; Izgu E. C.; Pal A.; Szostak J. W. (2017) Enhanced nonenzymatic RNA copying with 2-aminoimidazole activated nucleotides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 1810– 1813. 10.1021/jacs.6b13148. 28117989 PMC6326525 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Walton T.; Szostak J. W. (2016) A highly reactive imidazolium-bridged dinucleotide intermediate in nonenzymatic RNA primer extension,. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 11996– 12002. 10.1021/jacs.6b07977. 27552367 PMC6326528 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Wu T.; Orgel L. E. (1992) Nonenzymatic template-directed synthesis on hairpin oligonucleotides. 2. Templates containing cytidine and guanosine residues. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 5496– 5501. 10.1021/ja00040a002. 11538402 · DOI
  11. Tam C. P.; Fahrenbach A. C.; Björkbom A.; Prywes N.; Izgu E. C.; Szostak J. W. (2017) Downstream oligonucleotides strongly enhance the affinity of GMP to RNA primer-template complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 571– 574. 10.1021/jacs.6b09760. 28055190 PMC7547879 · DOI
  12. Zhang W.; Tam C. P.; Wang J.; Szostak J. W. (2016) Unusual base-pairing interactions in monomer-template complexes. ACS Cent. Sci. 2, 916– 926. 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00278. 28058281 PMC5200924 · DOI
  13. Zhang W.; Tam C. P.; Walton T.; Fahrenbach A. C.; Birrane G.; Szostak J. W. (2017) Insight into the mechanism of nonenzymatic RNA primer extension from the structure of an RNA-GpppG complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114, 7659– 7664. 10.1073/pnas.1704006114. 28673998 PMC5530681 · DOI
  14. Kanavarioti A.; Bernasconi C. F.; Doodokyan D. L.; Alberas D. J. (1989) Magnesium ion catalyzed P-N bond hydrolysis in imidazolide-activated nucleotides. Relevance to template-directed synthesis of polynucleotides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 7247– 7257. 10.1021/ja00200a053. 11542186 · DOI
  15. Li L.; Lelyveld V. S.; Prywes N.; Szostak J. W. (2016) Experimental and computational evidence for a loose transition state in phosphoroimidazolide hydrolysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 3986– 3989. 10.1021/jacs.6b00784. 26974265 PMC7547882 · DOI
  16. Kanavarioti A.; Bernasconi C. F.; Alberas D. J.; Baird E. E. (1993) Kinetic dissection of individual steps in the poly(C)-directed oligoguanylate synthesis from guanosine 5′-monophosphate 2-methylimidazolide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 8537– 8546. 10.1021/ja00072a003. 11539864 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kanavarioti A.; Bernasconi C. F.; Baird E. E. (1998) Effects of monomer and template concentration on the kinetics of nonenzymatic template-directed oligoguanylate synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 8575– 8581. 10.1021/ja9807237. · DOI
  18. Kervio E.; Claasen B.; Steiner U. E.; Richert C. (2014) The strength of the template effect attracting nucleotides to naked DNA,. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 7409– 7420. 10.1093/nar/gku314. 24875480 PMC4066754 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Izgu E. C.; Fahrenbach A. C.; Zhang N.; Li L.; Zhang W.; Larsen A. T.; Blain J. C.; Szostak J. W. (2015) Uncovering the thermodynamics of monomer binding for RNA replication. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 6373– 6382. 10.1021/jacs.5b02707. 25901790 PMC4984997 · DOI
  20. Kervio E.; Sosson M.; Richert C. (2016) The effect of leaving groups on binding and reactivity in enzyme-free copying of DNA and RNA,. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 5504– 5514. 10.1093/nar/gkw476. 27235418 PMC4937335 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Puthenvedu D.; Janas T.; Majerfeld I.; Illangasekare M.; Yarus M. (2015) Poly(U) RNA-templated synthesis of AppA. RNA 21, 1818– 1825. 10.1261/rna.052696.115. 26272215 PMC4574757 · DOI
  22. Majerfeld I.; Puthenvedu D.; Yarus M. (2016) Cross-backbone templating; ribodinucleotides made on poly(C). RNA 22, 397– 407. 10.1261/rna.054866.115. 26759450 PMC4748817 · DOI
  23. Wachowius F.; Attwater J.; Holliger P. (2017) Nucleic acids: function and potential for abiogenesis. Q. Rev. Biophys. 50, e4 10.1017/S0033583517000038. 29233216 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walton, T., & Szostak, J. W.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Szostak, Jack W.
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
2017-10-12
Volume
56
Issue
43
Pages
5739-5747
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W2762359702
Cited by
55
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biochemistry (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (NA)
  • Division of Chemistry (CHE-1607034)
  • Simons Foundation (290363)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
primer extension, polymerization kinetics, kinetic model, origin of life, competitive inhibition
MeSH terms
Cytidine Monophosphate, Kinetics, Models, Chemical, RNA, DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review