The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydrogen Bonds: Simple after All?
Open accessAbstract
Hydrogen bonds play integral roles in biological structure, function, and conformational dynamics and are fundamental to life as it has evolved on Earth. However, our understanding of these fundamental and ubiquitous interactions has seemed fractured and incomplete, and it has been difficult to extract generalities and principles about hydrogen bonds despite thousands of papers published on this topic, perhaps in part because of the expanse of this subject and the density of studies. Fortunately, recent hydrogen bond proposals, discussions, and debates have stimulated new tests and models and have led to a remarkably simple picture of the structure of hydrogen bonds. This knowledge also provides clarity concerning hydrogen bond energetics, limiting and simplifying the factors that need be considered. Herein we recount the advances that have led to this simpler view of hydrogen bond structure, dynamics, and energetics. A quantitative predictive model for hydrogen bond length can now be broadly and deeply applied to evaluate current proposals and to uncover structural features of proteins, their conformational restraints, and their correlated motions. In contrast, a quantitative energetic description of molecular recognition and catalysis by proteins remains an important ongoing challenge, although our improved understanding of hydrogen bonds may aid in testing predictions from current and future models. We close by codifying our current state of understanding into five "Rules for Hydrogen Bonding" that may provide a foundation for understanding and teaching about these vital interactions and for building toward a deeper understanding of hydrogen bond energetics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
van der Waals Volumes and Radii
Bondi, A. (1964) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100785a001 · Cited by 19,350
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
The Hydrogen Bond in the Solid State
Steiner, T. (2002) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20020104)41:1<48::aid-anie48>3.0.co;2-u · Cited by 6,247
An introduction to hydrogen bonding
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-3309 · Cited by 6,199
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702
Catalysis in chemistry and enzymology
Jencks, W. P. (1969) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,217
Platt, J. R. (1964) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.146.3642.347 · Cited by 2,907
Van der Waals Radii of Elements
Batsanov, S. S. (2001) · Inorganic Materials · doi:10.1023/a:1011625728803 · Cited by 1,861
A cartography of the van der Waals territories
Alvarez, S. (2013) · Dalton Transactions · doi:10.1039/c3dt50599e · Cited by 1,586
Electrostatic Basis for Enzyme Catalysis
Warshel, A., Sharma, P. K., Kato, M., Xiang, Y., Liu, H., & Olsson, M. H. M. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0503106 · Cited by 1,444
Cited by
Lalit, F., & Jose, A. M. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae1246 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Herschlag, D., & Pinney, M. M.
- Venue
- Biochemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-04-20
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3338-3352
- ISSN
- 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2799792890
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 11.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrogen Bonds: Simple after All? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00217
- The paper
- Herschlag, D., & Pinney, M. M. (2018). Hydrogen Bonds: Simple after All? Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00217
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.