Cited by 58biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationPolymer composites and self-healing

Synthesis, Properties, and Applications of Bio-Based Cyclic Aliphatic Polyesters

Open access
Yang, Philip B., Davidson, Matthew G., Edler, Karen J., Brown, Steven·2021·Biomacromolecules

Abstract

Cyclic polymers have long been reported in the literature, but their development has often been stunted by synthetic difficulties such as the presence of linear contaminants. Research into the synthesis of these polymers has made great progress in the past decade, and this review covers the synthesis, properties, and applications of cyclic polymers, with an emphasis on bio-based aliphatic polyesters. Synthetic routes to cyclic polymers synthesized from bioderived monomers, alongside mechanistic descriptions for both ring closure and ring expansion polymerization approaches, are reviewed. The review also highlights some of the unique physical properties of cyclic polymers together with potential applications. The findings illustrate the substantial recent developments made in the syntheses of cyclic polymers, as well as the progress which can be made in the commercialization of bio-based polymers through the versatility this topology provides.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00638

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fossil-based polymers are widely used in tissue engineering, and their chemical, physical, mechanical, and morphological properties can be adjusted according to the intended application.

    “FBPs are widely used in TE, and their chemical, physical, mechanical, and morphological properties (e.g., pore size and distribution, surface texture, typology, and crosslinking) can be adjusted according to the intended application (Figure 2) [13].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, P. B., Davidson, M. G., Edler, K. J., & Brown, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • Scott Bader (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Yang, Philip B.
Venue
Biomacromolecules
Published
2021-08-20
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
3649-3667
ISSN
  • 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4602
OpenAlex
W3195345569
Cited by
58
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomacromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • University of Bath
  • Centre for Sustainable and Circular Technologies, University of Bath
  • Scott Bader Co. Ltd
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
Keywords
ring polymers, ring-expansion polymerization, bio-based polymers
MeSH terms
Polyesters, Polymers, Polymerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review