Size-Limited Penetration of Nanoparticles into Porcine Respiratory Mucus after Aerosol Deposition
Abstract
We investigated the rheological properties and the penetration of differently sized carboxylated nanoparticles in pig pulmonary mucus, on different distance and time scales. Nanoparticles were either mechanically mixed into the mucus samples or deposited as an aerosol, the latter resembling a more physiologically relevant delivery scenario. After mechanical dispersion, 500 nm particles were locally trapped; a fraction of carboxylated tracer particles of 100 or 200 nm in diameter could however freely diffuse in these networks over distances of approximately 20 μm. In contrast, after aerosol deposition on top of the mucus layer only particles with a size of 100 nm were able to penetrate into mucus, suggesting the presence of smaller pores at the air-mucus interface compared to within mucus. These findings are relevant to an understanding of the fate of potentially harmful aerosol particles, such as pathogens, pollutants, and other nanomaterials after incidental inhalation, as well as for the design of pulmonary drug delivery systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Micelles with a size in the range from 30 to 100 nm can easily accumulate in highly permeable tumors, whereas poorly permeable tumors are pervaded only by micelles with dimension of 30 nm.
“For instance, it has been proven that micelles with a size in the range from 30 to 100 nm can easily accumulate in highly permeable tumors, whereas poorly permeable tumors are pervaded only by micelles with dimension of 30 nm, hence-confirming the key role of size [57].”
From Polymeric micelles in drug delivery: An insight of the techniques for their characterization and assessment in biorelevant conditions (2021) · cites this paper as [57]
Cites
Biological hydrogels as selective diffusion barriers
Lieleg, O., & Ribbeck, K. (2011) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2011.06.002 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ghezzi, M., Pescina, S., Padula, C., Santi, P., Del Favero, E., Cantù, L., & Nicoli, S. (2021) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.02.031 · Cited by 1,135 · see citing works
Physicochemical properties of mucus and their impact on transmucosal drug delivery
Leal, J., Smyth, H. D. C., & Ghosh, D. (2017) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.09.018 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
- Authors
- Murgia, X., Pawelzyk, P., Schaefer, U. F., Wagner, C., Willenbacher, N., & Lehr, C.-M.
- Affiliations
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Lehr, Claus-Michael
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-03-15
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1536-1542
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2293305692
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biomacromolecules (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Keywords
- carboxylated nanoparticles, nanoparticle penetration, aerosol deposition, mucus rheology, particle size effects, nanoparticle diffusion, pulmonary drug delivery, inhalation exposure, porcine lung
- MeSH terms
- Aerosols, Animals, Biological Transport, Drug Carriers, Lung, Mucus, Particle Size, Rheology, Swine, Respiratory Mucosa, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review