Cited by 144Inhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryAdvanced Drug Delivery Systems

Size-Limited Penetration of Nanoparticles into Porcine Respiratory Mucus after Aerosol Deposition

Murgia, Xabier, Pawelzyk, Paul, Schaefer, Ulrich F., Wagner, Christian, Willenbacher, Norbert, Lehr, Claus-Michael·2016·Biomacromolecules

Abstract

We investigated the rheological properties and the penetration of differently sized carboxylated nanoparticles in pig pulmonary mucus, on different distance and time scales. Nanoparticles were either mechanically mixed into the mucus samples or deposited as an aerosol, the latter resembling a more physiologically relevant delivery scenario. After mechanical dispersion, 500 nm particles were locally trapped; a fraction of carboxylated tracer particles of 100 or 200 nm in diameter could however freely diffuse in these networks over distances of approximately 20 μm. In contrast, after aerosol deposition on top of the mucus layer only particles with a size of 100 nm were able to penetrate into mucus, suggesting the presence of smaller pores at the air-mucus interface compared to within mucus. These findings are relevant to an understanding of the fate of potentially harmful aerosol particles, such as pathogens, pollutants, and other nanomaterials after incidental inhalation, as well as for the design of pulmonary drug delivery systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00164

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Micelles with a size in the range from 30 to 100 nm can easily accumulate in highly permeable tumors, whereas poorly permeable tumors are pervaded only by micelles with dimension of 30 nm.

    “For instance, it has been proven that micelles with a size in the range from 30 to 100 nm can easily accumulate in highly permeable tumors, whereas poorly permeable tumors are pervaded only by micelles with dimension of 30 nm, hence-confirming the key role of size [57].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murgia, X., Pawelzyk, P., Schaefer, U. F., Wagner, C., Willenbacher, N., & Lehr, C.-M.
Affiliations
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Corresponding author
Lehr, Claus-Michael
Venue
Biomacromolecules
Published
2016-03-15
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
1536-1542
ISSN
  • 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4602
OpenAlex
W2293305692
Cited by
144
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomacromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
Keywords
carboxylated nanoparticles, nanoparticle penetration, aerosol deposition, mucus rheology, particle size effects, nanoparticle diffusion, pulmonary drug delivery, inhalation exposure, porcine lung
MeSH terms
Aerosols, Animals, Biological Transport, Drug Carriers, Lung, Mucus, Particle Size, Rheology, Swine, Respiratory Mucosa, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review