Cited by 13Machine Learning in Materials ScienceMultiferroics and related materialsComputational and Text Analysis Methods

Text Mining the Literature to Inform Experiments and Rationalize Impurity Phase Formation for BiFeO3

Open access
Cruse, Kevin, Baibakova, Viktoriia, Abdelsamie, Maged, Hong, Kootak, Bartel, Christopher J., Trewartha, Amalie, Jain, Anubhav, Sutter-Fella, Carolin M. +1 more·2024·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

thin-film synthesis through the sol-gel technique. Using a high-quality dataset of 331 synthesis procedures and outcomes extracted manually from 177 scientific articles, we trained decision tree models that reinforce important experimental heuristics for the avoidance of phase impurities but ultimately show limited predictive capability. We find that several important synthesis features, identified by our model, are often not reported in the literature. To test our ability to correctly impute missing synthesis parameters, we attempted to reproduce nine syntheses from the literature with varying degrees of "missingness". We demonstrate how a text-mined dataset can be made useful by informing new controlled experiments and forming a better understanding for impurity phase formation in this complex oxide system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c02203

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Cruse, K., Baibakova, V., Abdelsamie, M., Hong, K., Bartel, C. J., Trewartha, A., Jain, A., Sutter-Fella, C. M., & Ceder, G.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
  • Chonnam National University (KR)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Molecular Foundry Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
Corresponding author
Ceder, Gerbrand
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2023-12-29
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
772-785
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W4390394469
Cited by
13
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemistry of Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Basic Energy Sciences (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Multiferroics and related materials
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Keywords
BiFeO3, secondary phases, sol-gel synthesis, thin film fabrication, text mining, decision tree, missing data, perovskite oxides, controlled experiments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review