Text Mining the Literature to Inform Experiments and Rationalize Impurity Phase Formation for BiFeO3
Open accessAbstract
thin-film synthesis through the sol-gel technique. Using a high-quality dataset of 331 synthesis procedures and outcomes extracted manually from 177 scientific articles, we trained decision tree models that reinforce important experimental heuristics for the avoidance of phase impurities but ultimately show limited predictive capability. We find that several important synthesis features, identified by our model, are often not reported in the literature. To test our ability to correctly impute missing synthesis parameters, we attempted to reproduce nine syntheses from the literature with varying degrees of "missingness". We demonstrate how a text-mined dataset can be made useful by informing new controlled experiments and forming a better understanding for impurity phase formation in this complex oxide system.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Semi-supervised machine-learning classification of materials synthesis procedures
Huo, H., Rong, Z., Kononova, O., Sun, W., Botari, T., He, T., Tshitoyan, V., & Ceder, G. (2019) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-019-0204-1 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Self-citationStructured information extraction from complex scientific text with fine-tuned large language models
Dunn, A., Dagdelen, J., Walker, N., Lee, S., Rosen, A. S., Ceder, G., Persson, K., & Jain, A. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.05238 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Cruse, K., Baibakova, V., Abdelsamie, M., Hong, K., Bartel, C. J., Trewartha, A., Jain, A., Sutter-Fella, C. M., & Ceder, G.
- Affiliations
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
- Chonnam National University (KR)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Molecular Foundry Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
- Corresponding author
- Ceder, Gerbrand
- ORCID
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-12-29
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 772-785
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- PMC
- PMC10809418
- OpenAlex
- W4390394469
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Chemistry of Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Basic Energy Sciences (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Multiferroics and related materials
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Keywords
- BiFeO3, secondary phases, sol-gel synthesis, thin film fabrication, text mining, decision tree, missing data, perovskite oxides, controlled experiments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review