Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 386

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

First-Principles Studies on Cation Dopants and Electrolyte|Cathode Interphases for Lithium Garnets

Miara, Lincoln J., Richards, William Davidson, Wang, Yan E., Ceder, Gerbrand·2015·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

Lithium garnet with the formula Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) has many properties of an ideal electrolyte in all-solid state lithium batteries. However, internal resistance in batteries utilizing these electrolytes remains high. For widespread adoption, the LLZO’s internal resistance must be lowered by increasing its bulk conductivity, reducing grain boundary resistance, and/or pairing it with an appropriate cathode to minimize interfacial resistance. Cation doping has been shown to be crucial in LLZO to stabilize the higher conductivity cubic structure, yet there is still little understanding about which cations have high solubility in LLZO. In this work, we apply density functional theory (DFT) to calculate the defect energies and site preference of all possible dopants in these materials. Our findings suggest several novel dopants such as Zn 2+ and Mg 2+ predicted to be stable on the Li- and Zr-sites, respectively. To understand the source of interfacial resistance between the electrolyte and the cathode, we investigate the thermodynamic stability of the electrolyte|cathode interphase, calculating the reaction energy for LLMO (M = Zr, Ta) against LiCoO 2, LiMnO 2, and LiFePO 4 (LCO, LMO, and LFP, respectively) cathodes over the voltage range seen in lithium-ion battery operation. Our results suggest that, for LLZO, the LLZO|LCO is the most stable, showing only a low driving force for decomposition in the charged state into La 2 O 3, La 2 Zr 2 O 7, and Li 2 CoO 3, while the LLZO|LFP appears to be the most reactive, forming Li 3 PO 4, La 2 Zr 2 O 7, LaFeO 3, and Fe 2 O 3 . These results provide a reference for use by researchers interested in bonding these electrolytes to cathodes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01023

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 386

Metadata

Authors
Miara, L. J., Richards, W. D., Wang, Y. E., & Ceder, G.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2015-05-15
Volume
27
Issue
11
Pages
4040-4047
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2319792789
Cited by
386
References
3
FWCI
11.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First-Principles Studies on Cation Dopants and Electrolyte|Cathode Interphases for Lithium Garnets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01023
The paper
Miara, L. J., Richards, W. D., Wang, Y. E., & Ceder, G. (2015). First-Principles Studies on Cation Dopants and Electrolyte|Cathode Interphases for Lithium Garnets. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01023

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.