Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 450

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanism for Liquid Phase Exfoliation of MoS2

Jawaid, Ali, Nepal, Dhriti, Park, Kyoungweon, Jespersen, Michael, Qualley, Anthony, Mirau, Peter, Drummy, Lawrence F., Vaia, Richard A.·2016·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

A highly efficient, reproducible, and scalable approach for exfoliation of MoS 2 is critical for utilizing these emerging materials from coatings and composites to printable devices. Additive-free techniques, such as solvent-assisted exfoliation via sonication, are considered to be the most viable approach, where N -methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) is the most effective solvent. However, understanding the mechanism of exfoliation and the key role NMP plays during the process have been elusive and challenges effective improvements in product yield and quality. Here, we report systematic experiments to understand the mechanism of solvent-assisted exfoliation by elucidating the sonolysis chemistries associated with NMP. It is confirmed that in the presence of O 2 (g) dissolved moisture in NMP plays a critical role during sonication. The higher the moisture content, the more efficient the exfoliation process is. Conversely, when exfoliations are carried out with dried solvents with an inert atmosphere, reaction yields decrease. This is due to redox-active species formed in situ through an autoxidation pathway that converts NMP to N -methyl succinimide by hydroperoxide intermediates. These highly reactive species appear to aid exfoliation by oxidation at reactive edge sites; the charging creates Coulombic repulsion between neighboring sheets that disrupts interlayer basal plane bonding and enables electrostatic stabilization of particles in high-dipole solvents. From these insights, exfoliation in previously reported inactive solvents (e.g., acetonitrile), as well as in the absence of probe sonication, is demonstrated. These findings illustrate that exfoliation of MoS 2, and possibly TMD’s in general, can be mediated through understanding the chemistry occurring at the surface–solvent interface.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04224

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 450

Metadata

Authors
Jawaid, A., Nepal, D., Park, K., Jespersen, M., Qualley, A., Mirau, P., Drummy, L. F., & Vaia, R. A.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2015-12-31
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
337-348
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2221637804
Cited by
450
References
5
FWCI
12.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanism for Liquid Phase Exfoliation of MoS2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04224
The paper
Jawaid, A., Nepal, D., Park, K., Jespersen, M., Qualley, A., Mirau, P., Drummy, L. F., & Vaia, R. A. (2016). Mechanism for Liquid Phase Exfoliation of MoS2. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04224

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.