Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hydrogen Storage in the Expanded Pore Metal–Organic Frameworks M2(dobpdc) (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn)

Gygi, David, Bloch, Eric D., Mason, Jarad A., Hudson, Matthew R., Gonzalez, Miguel I., Siegelman, Rebecca L., Darwish, Tamim A., Queen, Wendy L., Brown, Craig M., Long, Jeffrey R.·2016·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

The hydrogen storage properties of a new family of isostructural metal–organic frameworks are reported. The frameworks M 2 (dobpdc) (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn; dobpdc 4– = 4,4′-dioxidobiphenyl-3,3′-dicarboxylate) are analogous to the widely studied M 2 (dobdc) (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn; dobdc 4– = 2,5-dioxido-1,4-benzenedicarboxylate) family of materials, featuring the same weak-field oxo-based ligand environment for the M 2+ metal centers, but with a larger pore volume resulting from the extended length of the dobpdc 4– linker. Hydrogen gas adsorption isotherms measured at 77 and 87 K indicate strong H 2 binding at low pressures, corresponding to the adsorption of one molecule per M 2+ site. Isosteric heats of adsorption indicate adsorption enthalpies ranging from −8.8 to −12.0 kJ/mol, with the trend Zn < Mn < Fe < Mg < Co < Ni. Room-temperature high-pressure adsorption isotherms indicate enhanced gravimetric uptakes compared to the M 2 (dobdc) analogues, a result of the higher surface areas and pore volumes of the expanded frameworks. Indeed, powder neutron diffraction experiments performed on Fe 2 (dobpdc) reveal two additional secondary H 2 adsorption sites not observed for the nonexpanded framework. While displaying higher gravimetric capacities than their nonexpanded counterparts, the larger pore volumes result in lower volumetric capacities. Upon comparison with other promising frameworks for hydrogen storage, it becomes evident that in order to design future materials for on-board hydrogen storage, care must be placed in achieving both a high surface area and a high volumetric density of exposed metal cation sites in order to maximize gravimetric and volumetric capacities simultaneously.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04538

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Gygi, D., Bloch, E. D., Mason, J. A., Hudson, M. R., Gonzalez, M. I., Siegelman, R. L., Darwish, T. A., Queen, W. L., Brown, C. M., & Long, J. R.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2016-02-10
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
1128-1138
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2259777538
Cited by
211
References
4
FWCI
12.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrogen Storage in the Expanded Pore Metal–Organic Frameworks M2(dobpdc) (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04538
The paper
Gygi, D., Bloch, E. D., Mason, J. A., Hudson, M. R., Gonzalez, M. I., Siegelman, R. L., Darwish, T. A., Queen, W. L., Brown, C. M., & Long, J. R. (2016). Hydrogen Storage in the Expanded Pore Metal–Organic Frameworks M2(dobpdc) (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn). Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04538

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.