Cited by 509Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

Iron–Nickel Nitride Nanostructures in Situ Grown on Surface-Redox-Etching Nickel Foam: Efficient and Ultrasustainable Electrocatalysts for Overall Water Splitting

Zhang, Bo, Xiao, Chunhui, Xie, Sanmu, Liang, Jin, Chen, Xu, Tang, Yuhai·2016·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

Water splitting is widely considered to be a promising strategy for clean and efficient energy production. In this paper, for the first time we report an in situ growth of iron–nickel nitride nanostructures on surface-redox-etching Ni foam (FeNi 3 N/NF) as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting. This method does not require a specially added nickel precursor nor an oxidizing agent, but achieves well-dispersed iron–nickel nitride nanostructures that are grown directly on the nickel foam surface. The commercial Ni foam in this work not only acts as a substrate but also serves as a slow-releasing nickel precursor that is induced by redox-etching of Fe 3+ . FeCl 2 is a more preferable iron precursor than FeCl 3 for no matter quality of FeNi 3 N growth or its electrocatalytic behaviors. The obtained FeNi 3 N/NF exhibits extraordinarily high activities for both oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) with low overpotentials of 202 and 75 mV at 10 mA cm –2, Tafel slopes of 40 and 98 mV dec –1, respectively. In addition, the presented FeNi 3 N/NF catalyst has an extremely good durability, reflecting in more than 400 h of consistent galvanostatic electrolysis without any visible voltage elevation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02610

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, B., Xiao, C., Xie, S., Liang, J., Chen, X., & Tang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
  • Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Science, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Corresponding author
Xiao, Chunhui
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2016-09-21
Volume
28
Issue
19
Pages
6934-6941
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2516747475
Cited by
509
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 49
FWCI
18.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemistry of Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (08143099)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (2015JQ2046)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M562392)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21405119)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Keywords
nickel foam, in situ growth, bifunctional electrocatalysts, overall water splitting, oxygen evolution reaction, hydrogen evolution reaction, nickel precursors, iron precursor, electrocatalyst durability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review