Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In Situ Chemical Imaging of Solid-Electrolyte Interphase Layer Evolution in Li–S Batteries

Open access
Nandasiri, Manjula I., Camacho-Forero, Luis E., Schwarz, Ashleigh M., Shutthanandan, Vaithiyalingam, Thevuthasan, Suntharampillai, Balbuena, Perla B., Mueller, Karl T., Murugesan, Vijayakumar·2017·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

Parasitic reactions of electrolyte and polysulfide with the Li-anode in lithium sulfur (Li–S) batteries lead to the formation of solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layers, which are the major reason behind severe capacity fading in these systems. Despite numerous studies, the evolution mechanism of the SEI layer and specific roles of polysulfides and other electrolyte components are still unclear. We report an in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and chemical imaging analysis combined with ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) computational modeling to gain fundamental understanding regarding the evolution of SEI layers on Li-anodes within Li–S batteries. A multimodal approach involving AIMD modeling and in situ XPS characterization uniquely reveals the chemical identity and distribution of active participants in parasitic reactions as well as the SEI layer evolution mechanism. The SEI layer evolution has three major stages: the formation of a primary composite mixture phase involving stable lithium compounds (Li 2 S, LiF, Li 2 O, etc.) and formation of a secondary matrix type phase due to cross interaction between reaction products and electrolyte components, which is followed by a highly dynamic monoanionic polysulfide (i.e., LiS 5 ) fouling process. These new molecular-level insights into the SEI layer evolution on Li-anodes are crucial for delineating effective strategies for the development of Li–S batteries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00374

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Nandasiri, M. I., Camacho-Forero, L. E., Schwarz, A. M., Shutthanandan, V., Thevuthasan, S., Balbuena, P. B., Mueller, K. T., & Murugesan, V.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2017-05-16
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
4728-4737
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2611654527
Cited by
218
References
2
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Situ Chemical Imaging of Solid-Electrolyte Interphase Layer Evolution in Li–S Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00374
The paper
Nandasiri, M. I., Camacho-Forero, L. E., Schwarz, A. M., Shutthanandan, V., Thevuthasan, S., Balbuena, P. B., Mueller, K. T., & Murugesan, V. (2017). In Situ Chemical Imaging of Solid-Electrolyte Interphase Layer Evolution in Li–S Batteries. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00374

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.