Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 215

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Probing Solid–Solid Interfacial Reactions in All-Solid-State Sodium-Ion Batteries with First-Principles Calculations

Open access
Tang, Hanmei, Deng, Zhi, Lin, Zhuonan, Wang, Zhenbin, Chu, Iek-Heng, Chen, Chi, Zhu, Zhuoying, Zheng, Chen, Ong, Shyue Ping·2018·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

We present an exposition of first-principles approaches to elucidating interfacial reactions in all-solid-state sodium-ion batteries. We will demonstrate how thermodynamic approximations based on assumptions of fast alkali diffusion and multispecies equilibrium can be used to effectively screen combinations of Na-ion electrodes, solid electrolytes, and buffer oxides for electrochemical and chemical compatibility. We find that exchange reactions, especially between simple oxides and thiophosphate groups to form PO 4 3–, are the main cause of large driving forces for cathode/solid electrolyte interfacial reactions. A high reactivity with large volume changes is also predicted at the Na anode/solid electrolyte interface, while the Na 2 Ti 3 O 7 anode is predicted to be much more stable against a broad range of solid electrolytes. We identify several promising binary oxides, Sc 2 O 3, SiO 2, TiO 2, ZrO 2, and HfO 2, that are similarly or more chemically compatible with most electrodes and solid electrolytes than the commonly used Al 2 O 3 is. Finally, we show that ab initio molecular dynamics simulations of the NaCoO 2 /Na 3 PS 4 interface model predict that the formation of SO 4 2– -containing compounds and Na 3 P is kinetically favored over the formation of PO 4 3– -containing compounds, in contrast to the predictions of the thermodynamic models. This work provides useful insights into materials selection strategies for enabling stable electrode/solid electrolyte interfaces, a critical bottleneck in designing all-solid-state sodium-ion batteries, and outlines several testable predictions for future experimental validation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04096

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 215

Metadata

Authors
Tang, H., Deng, Z., Lin, Z., Wang, Z., Chu, I.-H., Chen, C., Zhu, Z., Zheng, C., & Ong, S. P.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2017-12-28
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
163-173
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2775270918
Cited by
215
References
4
FWCI
7.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probing Solid–Solid Interfacial Reactions in All-Solid-State Sodium-Ion Batteries with First-Principles Calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04096
The paper
Tang, H., Deng, Z., Lin, Z., Wang, Z., Chu, I.-H., Chen, C., Zhu, Z., Zheng, C., & Ong, S. P. (2018). Probing Solid–Solid Interfacial Reactions in All-Solid-State Sodium-Ion Batteries with First-Principles Calculations. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04096

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.