The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Capacity Fading of Ni-Rich Li[NixCoyMn1–x–y]O2 (0.6 ≤ x ≤ 0.95) Cathodes for High-Energy-Density Lithium-Ion Batteries: Bulk or Surface Degradation?
Abstract
Ni-rich Li[Ni x Co y Mn 1– x – y ]O 2 cathodes ( x = 0.6, 0.8, 0.9, and 0.95) were tested to characterize the capacity fading mechanism of extremely rich Ni compositions. Increasing the Ni fraction in the cathode delivered a higher discharge capacity (192.9 mA h g –1 for Li[Ni 0.6 Co 0.2 Mn 0.2 ]O 2 versus 235.0 mA h g –1 for Li[Ni 0.95 Co 0.025 Mn 0.025 ]O 2 ); however, the cycling stability was substantially reduced. Li[Ni 0.6 Co 0.2 Mn 0.2 ]O 2 and Li[Ni 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 ]O 2 retained more than 95% of their respective initial capacities after 100 cycles, while the capacity retention of Li[Ni 0.9 Co 0.05 Mn 0.05 ]O 2 and Li[Ni 0.95 Co 0.025 Mn 0.025 ]O 2 was limited to 85% during the same cycling period. The relatively inferior cycling stability of Li[Ni x Co y Mn 1– x – y ]O 2 with x > 0.8 is attributed to the phase transition near the charge-end, causing an abrupt anisotropic shrinkage (or expansion during discharge), which was suppressed for compositions of x < 0.8. Residual stress stemming from the phase transition destabilized the internal microcracks and allowed the microcracks to propagate to the surface, providing channels for electrolyte penetration and subsequent degradation of the exposed internal surfaces formed by the microcracks. Further developments in particle morphology are required to dissipate the intrinsic lattice strain, stabilize the surface, and modify the composition to attain a satisfactory long-term cycling stability, and hence battery life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Heterogeneous damage in Li-ion batteries: Experimental analysis and theoretical modeling
Xu, R., Yang, Y., Yin, F., Liu, P., Cloetens, P., Liu, Y., Lin, F., & Zhao, K. (2019) · Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids · doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2019.05.003 · Cited by 345
Reducing cobalt from lithium-ion batteries for the electric vehicle era
Ryu, H.-H., Sun, H. H., Myung, S.-T., Yoon, C. S., & Sun, Y.-K. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee03581e · Cited by 331
Self-citationChakraborty, A., Kunnikuruvan, S., Kumar, S., Markovsky, B., Aurbach, D., Dixit, M., & Major, D. T. (2020) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04066 · Cited by 322
Kim, U., Ryu, H., Kim, J., Mücke, R., Kaghazchi, P., Yoon, C. S., & Sun, Y. (2019) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201803902 · Cited by 298
Self-citationCobalt‐Free High‐Capacity Ni‐Rich Layered Li[Ni0.9Mn0.1]O2 Cathode
Aishova, A., Park, G., Yoon, C. S., & Sun, Y. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201903179 · Cited by 269
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryu, H.-H., Park, K.-J., Yoon, C. S., & Sun, Y.-K.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-02-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1155-1163
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2787322343
- Cited by
- 1,629
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 48.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Capacity Fading of Ni-Rich Li[NixCoyMn1–x–y]O2 (0.6 ≤ x ≤ 0.95) Cathodes for High-Energy-Density Lithium-Ion Batteries: Bulk or Surface Degradation? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05269
- The paper
- Ryu, H.-H., Park, K.-J., Yoon, C. S., & Sun, Y.-K. (2018). Capacity Fading of Ni-Rich Li[NixCoyMn1–x–y]O2 (0.6 ≤ x ≤ 0.95) Cathodes for High-Energy-Density Lithium-Ion Batteries: Bulk or Surface Degradation? Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05269
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.