Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine Learning and Energy Minimization Approaches for Crystal Structure Predictions: A Review and New Horizons

Graser, Jake, Kauwe, Steven K., Sparks, Taylor D.·2018·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

Predicting crystal structure has always been a challenging problem for physical sciences. Recently, computational methods have been built to predict crystal structure with success but have been limited in scope and computational time. In this paper, we review computational methods such as density functional theory and machine learning methods used to predict crystal structure. We also explored the breadth versus accuracy of building a model to predict across any crystal structure using machine learning. We extracted 24 913 unique chemical formulas existing between 290 and 310 K from the Pearson Crystal Database. Of these 24 913 formulas, there exists 10 711 unique crystal structures referred to as entry prototypes. Common entries might have hundreds of chemical compositions, while the vast majority of entry prototypes is represented by fewer than ten unique compositions. To include all data in our predictions, entry prototypes that lacked a minimum number of representatives were relabeled as “Other”. By selecting the minimum numbers to be 150, 100, 70, 40, 20, and 10, we explored how limiting class sizes affected performance. Using each minimum number to reorganize the data, we looked at the classification performance metrics: accuracy, precision, and recall. Accuracy ranged from 97 ± 2 to 85 ± 2%; average precision ranged from 86 ± 2 to 79 ± 2%, while average recall ranged from 73 ± 2 to 54 ± 2% for minimum-class representatives from 150 to 10, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05304

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Graser, J., Kauwe, S. K., & Sparks, T. D.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2018-05-19
Volume
30
Issue
11
Pages
3601-3612
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2804765537
Cited by
200
References
5
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine Learning and Energy Minimization Approaches for Crystal Structure Predictions: A Review and New Horizons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05304
The paper
Graser, J., Kauwe, S. K., & Sparks, T. D. (2018). Machine Learning and Energy Minimization Approaches for Crystal Structure Predictions: A Review and New Horizons. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05304

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.