Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding Ionic Diffusion through SEI Components for Lithium-Ion and Sodium-Ion Batteries: Insights from First-Principles Calculations

Soto, Fernando A., Marzouk, Asma, El-Mellouhi, Fedwa, Balbuena, Perla B.·2018·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

The insufficient understanding of the physical and chemical phenomena taking place at the electrode–electrolyte interface is the main roadblock for improvement of current battery technologies and development of new ones. Of particular interest is the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer because many aspects of the battery performance depend on its quality. Recently we have shown that a stable SEI layer can be designed in specific Li- or Na-based electrolytes. In this paper, we continue exploring this concept by identifying the interactions that take place at the lithiated (or sodiated) carbon–electrolyte interface and discussing the transport mechanisms of Li and Na ions through the most commonly found SEI layer inorganic components. For the ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations, we considered the case of the sodiated hard carbon structure. The simulations show the decomposition of ethylene carbonate on the edge of the graphite layers leading to products such as CO and other organic fragments. The decomposition of the PF 6 – anion is a precursor step for the formation of NaF layers. Regarding the Li- and Na-ion transport through the SEI, the results show that the energy to create defects is lowest when Li ions are guests at an interstitial position in NaF and lattice positions in Na 2 CO 3 . For the LiF and Li 2 CO 3 crystals, the energy to create defects is lowest when Na ions substitute Li. This lower energy cost for Li-ion defects in Na-based components is due to the smaller size of the Li ion when compared to the Na ion. Regarding diffusion barriers, the Na ions in Li-based SEI components show a preference for the vacancy diffusion and knock-off mechanisms as the preferred pathways to migrate through the SEI while Li ions in Na-based SEI components prefer a mechanism involving the migration of the interstitial ion through the knock-off or direct hopping mechanism. This work also emphasizes the interplay between the crystallographic orientation of the SEI components and the direction dependent ion migration guiding the controlled design of efficient artificial SEI layers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00635

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Soto, F. A., Marzouk, A., El-Mellouhi, F., & Balbuena, P. B.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2018-04-23
Volume
30
Issue
10
Pages
3315-3322
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2800874144
Cited by
188
References
4
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Ionic Diffusion through SEI Components for Lithium-Ion and Sodium-Ion Batteries: Insights from First-Principles Calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00635
The paper
Soto, F. A., Marzouk, A., El-Mellouhi, F., & Balbuena, P. B. (2018). Understanding Ionic Diffusion through SEI Components for Lithium-Ion and Sodium-Ion Batteries: Insights from First-Principles Calculations. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00635

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.