Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Record High Hydrogen Storage Capacity in the Metal–Organic Framework Ni2(m-dobdc) at Near-Ambient Temperatures

Open access
Kapelewski, Matthew T., Runčevski, Tomče, Tarver, Jacob D., Jiang, Henry Z. H., Hurst, Katherine E., Parilla, Philip A., Ayala, Anthony, Gennett, Thomas, FitzGerald, Stephen A., Brown, Craig M., Long, Jeffrey R.·2018·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

Hydrogen holds promise as a clean alternative automobile fuel, but its on-board storage presents significant challenges due to the low temperatures and/or high pressures required to achieve a sufficient energy density. The opportunity to significantly reduce the required pressure for high density H 2 storage persists for metal–organic frameworks due to their modular structures and large internal surface areas. The measurement of H 2 adsorption in such materials under conditions most relevant to on-board storage is crucial to understanding how these materials would perform in actual applications, although such data have to date been lacking. In the present work, the metal–organic frameworks M 2 ( m -dobdc) (M = Co, Ni; m -dobdc 4– = 4,6-dioxido-1,3-benzenedicarboxylate) and the isomeric frameworks M 2 (dobdc) (M = Co, Ni; dobdc 4– = 1,4-dioxido-1,3-benzenedicarboxylate), which are known to have open metal cation sites that strongly interact with H 2, were evaluated for their usable volumetric H 2 storage capacities over a range of near-ambient temperatures relevant to on-board storage. Based upon adsorption isotherm data, Ni 2 ( m -dobdc) was found to be the top-performing physisorptive storage material with a usable volumetric capacity between 100 and 5 bar of 11.0 g/L at 25 °C and 23.0 g/L with a temperature swing between −75 and 25 °C. Additional neutron diffraction and infrared spectroscopy experiments performed with in situ dosing of D 2 or H 2 were used to probe the hydrogen storage properties of these materials under the relevant conditions. The results provide benchmark characteristics for comparison with future attempts to achieve improved adsorbents for mobile hydrogen storage applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03276

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
Kapelewski, M. T., Runčevski, T., Tarver, J. D., Jiang, H. Z. H., Hurst, K. E., Parilla, P. A., Ayala, A., Gennett, T., FitzGerald, S. A., Brown, C. M., & Long, J. R.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2018-11-07
Volume
30
Issue
22
Pages
8179-8189
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2899766915
Cited by
283
References
46
FWCI
8.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Record High Hydrogen Storage Capacity in the Metal–Organic Framework Ni2(m-dobdc) at Near-Ambient Temperatures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03276
The paper
Kapelewski, M. T., Runčevski, T., Tarver, J. D., Jiang, H. Z. H., Hurst, K. E., Parilla, P. A., Ayala, A., Gennett, T., FitzGerald, S. A., Brown, C. M., & Long, J. R. (2018). Record High Hydrogen Storage Capacity in the Metal–Organic Framework Ni2(m-dobdc) at Near-Ambient Temperatures. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03276

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.