Cited by 43Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismPsychedelics and Drug Studies

Metabolic Fate of Hallucinogenic NBOMes

Open access
Leth-Petersen, Sebastian, Gabel-Jensen, Charlotte, Gillings, Nic, Lehel, Szabolzs, Hansen, Hanne D., Knudsen, Gitte M., Kristensen, Jesper L.·2016·Chemical Research in Toxicology

Abstract

2,5-Dimethoxy-N-benzylphenethylamines (NBOMes) are very potent 5-HT2AR agonists. Illicit use of these psychedelic compounds has emerged in recent years, and several fatalities have been linked to their recreational use. In its [(11)C]-labeled form, one NBOMe (25B-NBOMe) was recently developed as a PET-ligand for clinical investigations of 5HT2AR ([(11)C]Cimbi-36). Herein, we have identified the phase I and phase II metabolites of 25B-NBOMe in pigs as well as in humans. We find that the primary route of metabolism is 5'-demethylation, followed by conjugation to glucuronic acid. Carbon-11 labeling of 25B-NBOMe in three different positions followed by in vivo evaluation in pigs and humans corroborated these findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00450

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diemethoxyphenethylamines such as [11C]-Cimbi-36 are metabolized in pigs and humans by demethylation, usually in the 5-position, and subsequently glucuronation.

    “The diemethoxyphenethylamines such as [11C]-Cimbi-36 are metabolized in pigs and humans by demethylation, usually in the 5-position, and subsequently glucuronation [116].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leth-Petersen, S., Gabel-Jensen, C., Gillings, N., Lehel, S., Hansen, H. D., Knudsen, G. M., & Kristensen, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology and ‡Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Kristensen, Jesper L.
Venue
Chemical Research in Toxicology
Published
2015-12-29
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
96-100
ISSN
  • 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5010
OpenAlex
W2210848389
Cited by
43
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Research in Toxicology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Lundbeckfonden
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
Keywords
NBOMe, 5-HT2A receptor agonists, hallucinogens, drug metabolism, phase I metabolism, phase II metabolism, glucuronidation, carbon-11 radiolabeling, PET radiotracer
MeSH terms
Animals, Hallucinogens, Humans, Microsomes, Liver, Phenethylamines, Swine, Molecular Structure, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review