Cited by 347Psychedelics and Drug StudiesForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Psychedelics and mental health: a population study

Open access
Krebs, Teri S., Johansen, Pål-Ørjan·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The classical serotonergic psychedelics LSD, psilocybin, mescaline are not known to cause brain damage and are regarded as non-addictive. Clinical studies do not suggest that psychedelics cause long-term mental health problems. Psychedelics have been used in the Americas for thousands of years. Over 30 million people currently living in the US have used LSD, psilocybin, or mescaline. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between the lifetime use of psychedelics and current mental health in the adult population. METHOD: Data drawn from years 2001 to 2004 of the National Survey on Drug Use and Health consisted of 130,152 respondents, randomly selected to be representative of the adult population in the United States. Standardized screening measures for past year mental health included serious psychological distress (K6 scale), mental health treatment (inpatient, outpatient, medication, needed but did not receive), symptoms of eight psychiatric disorders (panic disorder, major depressive episode, mania, social phobia, general anxiety disorder, agoraphobia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and non-affective psychosis), and seven specific symptoms of non-affective psychosis. We calculated weighted odds ratios by multivariate logistic regression controlling for a range of sociodemographic variables, use of illicit drugs, risk taking behavior, and exposure to traumatic events. RESULTS: 21,967 respondents (13.4% weighted) reported lifetime psychedelic use. There were no significant associations between lifetime use of any psychedelics, lifetime use of specific psychedelics (LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, peyote), or past year use of LSD and increased rate of any of the mental health outcomes. Rather, in several cases psychedelic use was associated with lower rate of mental health problems. CONCLUSION: We did not find use of psychedelics to be an independent risk factor for mental health problems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0063972

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both mindfulness-based interventions and psychedelic-assisted therapy have successfully demonstrated reductions in clinical symptomatology in healthy individuals.

    “Both interventions have also successfully demonstrated reductions in clinical symptomatology in healthy individuals (65, 66).”

    From Examining the Potential Synergistic Effects Between Mindfulness Training and Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Results (Logistic Regression Results; page not provided) report lower rates of a few psychiatric symptoms among people with lifetime use of specific psychedelics. But this was an association, not a demonstrated reduction following psychedelic-assisted therapy. The Discussion (Clinical Studies in Healthy Volunteers; page not provided) reports an absence of lasting adverse effects, not symptom reductions, and the paper does not assess mindfulness-based interventions. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [36]Laing R, Siegel JA, editors (2003) Hallucinogens: A Forensic Drug Handbook. Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krebs, T. S., & Johansen, P.-Ø.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Krebs, Teri S.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-08-19
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
e63972
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014761647
Cited by
347
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
16.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Norges Forskningsråd (rcn-foriss-185924)
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
psychedelics, LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, peyote, mental health, serious psychological distress, mental illness, non-affective psychosis, lifetime drug use, risk factors for mental illness, National Survey on Drug Use and Health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Data Collection, Female, Hallucinogens, Humans, Lysergic Acid Diethylamide, Male, Mental Health, Mescaline, Middle Aged, Psilocybin, Risk Factors, United States, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review