The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategies for Carbon and Sulfur Tolerant Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Materials, Incorporating Lessons from Heterogeneous Catalysis
Open accessAbstract
Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are a rapidly emerging energy technology for a low carbon world, providing high efficiency, potential to use carbonaceous fuels, and compatibility with carbon capture and storage. However, current state-of-the-art materials have low tolerance to sulfur, a common contaminant of many fuels, and are vulnerable to deactivation due to carbon deposition when using carbon-containing compounds. In this review, we first study the theoretical basis behind carbon and sulfur poisoning, before examining the strategies toward carbon and sulfur tolerance used so far in the SOFC literature. We then study the more extensive relevant heterogeneous catalysis literature for strategies and materials which could be incorporated into carbon and sulfur tolerant fuel cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The nature of the active site in heterogeneous metal catalysis
Nørskov, J. K., Bligaard, T., Hvolbæk, B., Abild-Pedersen, F., Chorkendorff, I., & Christensen, C. H. (2008) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b800260f · Cited by 885
Cited by
Cheng, H., Li, M., Su, C., Li, N., & Liu, Z. (2017) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201701833 · Cited by 384
A comprehensive review of solid oxide fuel cells operating on various promising alternative fuels
Xu, Q., Guo, Z., Xia, L., He, Q., Li, Z., Temitope Bello, I., Zheng, K., & Ni, M. (2022) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115175 · Cited by 382
Progress and outlook for solid oxide fuel cells for transportation applications
Boldrin, P., & Brandon, N. P. (2019) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-019-0310-y · Cited by 363
Self-citationHeterointerface engineering for enhancing the electrochemical performance of solid oxide cells
Zhao, C., Li, Y., Zhang, W., Zheng, Y., Lou, X., Yu, B., Chen, J., Chen, Y., Liu, M., & Wang, J. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee02230a · Cited by 319
Optimized Metal Chalcogenides for Boosting Water Splitting
Yin, J., Jin, J., Lin, H., Yin, Z., Li, J., Lu, M., Guo, L., Xi, P., Tang, Y., & Yan, C. (2020) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201903070 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Boldrin, P., Ruiz-Trejo, E., Mermelstein, J., Bermúdez Menéndez, J. M., Ramı́rez Reina, T., & Brandon, N. P.
- Venue
- Chemical Reviews
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-11-09
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 13633-13684
- ISSN
- 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6890
- OpenAlex
- W2555304764
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies for Carbon and Sulfur Tolerant Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Materials, Incorporating Lessons from Heterogeneous Catalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00284
- The paper
- Boldrin, P., Ruiz-Trejo, E., Mermelstein, J., Bermúdez Menéndez, J. M., Ramı́rez Reina, T., & Brandon, N. P. (2016). Strategies for Carbon and Sulfur Tolerant Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Materials, Incorporating Lessons from Heterogeneous Catalysis. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00284
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
