Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 831

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Artificial Metalloenzymes: Reaction Scope and Optimization Strategies

Open access
Schwizer, Fabian, Okamoto, Yasunori, Heinisch, Tillmann, Gu, Yifan, Pellizzoni, Michela M., Lebrun, Vincent, Reuter, Raphael, Köhler, Valentin, Lewis, Jared C., Ward, Thomas R.·2018·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

The incorporation of a synthetic, catalytically competent metallocofactor into a protein scaffold to generate an artificial metalloenzyme (ArM) has been explored since the late 1970's. Progress in the ensuing years was limited by the tools available for both organometallic synthesis and protein engineering. Advances in both of these areas, combined with increased appreciation of the potential benefits of combining attractive features of both homogeneous catalysis and enzymatic catalysis, led to a resurgence of interest in ArMs starting in the early 2000's. Perhaps the most intriguing of potential ArM properties is their ability to endow homogeneous catalysts with a genetic memory. Indeed, incorporating a homogeneous catalyst into a genetically encoded scaffold offers the opportunity to improve ArM performance by directed evolution. This capability could, in turn, lead to improvements in ArM efficiency similar to those obtained for natural enzymes, providing systems suitable for practical applications and greater insight into the role of second coordination sphere interactions in organometallic catalysis. Since its renaissance in the early 2000's, different aspects of artificial metalloenzymes have been extensively reviewed and highlighted. Our intent is to provide a comprehensive overview of all work in the field up to December 2016, organized according to reaction class. Because of the wide range of non-natural reactions catalyzed by ArMs, this was done using a functional-group transformation classification. The review begins with a summary of the proteins and the anchoring strategies used to date for the creation of ArMs, followed by a historical perspective. Then follows a summary of the reactions catalyzed by ArMs and a concluding critical outlook. This analysis allows for comparison of similar reactions catalyzed by ArMs constructed using different metallocofactor anchoring strategies, cofactors, protein scaffolds, and mutagenesis strategies. These data will be used to construct a searchable Web site on ArMs that will be updated regularly by the authors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00014

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 831

Metadata

Authors
Schwizer, F., Okamoto, Y., Heinisch, T., Gu, Y., Pellizzoni, M. M., Lebrun, V., Reuter, R., Köhler, V., Lewis, J. C., & Ward, T. R.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2017-07-17
Volume
118
Issue
1
Pages
142-231
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W2735839143
Cited by
831
References
3
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial Metalloenzymes: Reaction Scope and Optimization Strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00014
The paper
Schwizer, F., Okamoto, Y., Heinisch, T., Gu, Y., Pellizzoni, M. M., Lebrun, V., Reuter, R., Köhler, V., Lewis, J. C., & Ward, T. R. (2018). Artificial Metalloenzymes: Reaction Scope and Optimization Strategies. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.