The DOI matches its Crossref record; 277 of the 277 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Highly Sensitive and Multiplexed Protein Measurements
Abstract
Proteins are involved in many biological processes. Misfolded, truncated, or mutated proteins as well as over- or underexpressed proteins have been implicated in many diseases. Therefore, detection and quantification of proteins is extremely important. Conventional techniques such as the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Western Blot, and mass spectrometry have enabled discovery and study of proteins in biological samples. However, many important proteins are present at low concentrations, rendering them undetectable using conventional techniques. Furthermore, limited ability to simultaneously measure multiple proteins in a sample has constrained our ability to fully study the proteome. In this review, we comprehensively discuss approaches for protein detection. We first discuss the fundamentals of proteins and protein assays, including affinity reagents, surface functionalization, assay formats, signal detection, and multiplexing. We then discuss the challenges with these methods and review existing methods for highly sensitive and multiplexed protein detection. Finally, we review recent advances in protein detection from the literature and discuss challenges and future directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PROTEIN MEASUREMENT WITH THE FOLIN PHENOL REAGENT
Lowry, O., Rosebrough, N., Farr, A. L., & Randall, R. (1951) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)52451-6 · Cited by 317,331
Bradford, M. M. (1976) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 · Cited by 255,302
Towbin, H., Staehelin, T., & Gordon, J. (1979) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350 · Cited by 53,385
Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy
(2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-46312-4 · Cited by 19,339
Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid
Smith, P. K., Krohn, R. I., Hermanson, G. T., Mallia, A. K., Gartner, F. H., Provenzano, M. D., Fujimoto, E. K., Goeke, N. M., Olson, B. J., & Klenk, D. C. (1985) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(85)90442-7 · Cited by 18,482
Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity
KÖHLER, G., & MILSTEIN, C. (1975) · Nature · doi:10.1038/256495a0 · Cited by 17,229
Tissue-based map of the human proteome
Uhlén, M., Fagerberg, L., Hallström, B. M., Lindskog, C., Oksvold, P., Mardinoglu, A., Sivertsson, Å., Kampf, C., Sjöstedt, E., Asplund, A., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1260419 · Cited by 15,286
Grätzel, M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35104607 · Cited by 12,687
Tuerk, C., & Gold, L. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2200121 · Cited by 10,405
In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands
Ellington, A. D., & Szostak, J. W. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/346818a0 · Cited by 9,812
Cited by
Dong, T., Matos Pires, N. M., Yang, Z., & Jiang, Z. (2023) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202205429 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, L., & Walt, D. R.
- Venue
- Chemical Reviews
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-08-28
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 293-321
- ISSN
- 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6890
- OpenAlex
- W2889161566
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 277
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly Sensitive and Multiplexed Protein Measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00257
- The paper
- Cohen, L., & Walt, D. R. (2019). Highly Sensitive and Multiplexed Protein Measurements. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00257
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.