The DOI matches its Crossref record; 136 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do Diradicals Behave Like Radicals?
Abstract
This review sets out to understand the reactivity of diradicals and how that may differ from monoradicals. In the first part of the review, we delineate the electronic structure of a diradical with its two degenerate or nearly degenerate molecular orbitals, occupied by two electrons. A classification of diradicals based on whether or not the two SOMOs can be located on different sites of the molecule is useful in determining the ground state spin. Important is a delocalized to localized orbital transformation that interchanges "closed-shell" to "open-shell" descriptions. The resulting duality is useful in understanding the dual reactivity of singlet diradicals. In the second part of the review, we examine, with a consistent level of theory, activation energies of prototypical radical reactions (dimerization, hydrogen abstraction, and addition to ethylene) for representative organic diradicals and diradicaloids in their two lowest spin states. Differences and similarities in reactivity of diradicals vs monoradicals, based on either a localized or delocalized view, whichever is suitable, are then discussed. The last part of this review begins with an extensive, comparative, and critical survey of available measures of diradical character and ends with an analysis of the consequences of diradical character for selected diradicaloids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Ambipolar Pentacene Field-Effect Transistors and Inverters
Schön, J. H., Berg, S., Kloc, C., & Batlogg, B. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5455.1022 · Cited by 357
RetractedLee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Dunning, T. H. (1989) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.456153 · Cited by 31,648
Electronic Population Analysis on LCAO–MO Molecular Wave Functions. I
Mulliken, R. S. (1955) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1740588 · Cited by 11,049
New Developments in Molecular Orbital Theory
Roothaan, C. C. J. (1951) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.23.69 · Cited by 5,519
Conceptual Density Functional Theory
Geerlings, P., De Proft, F., & Langenaeker, W. (2003) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr990029p · Cited by 5,296
Self-citationCharge Transport in Organic Semiconductors
Coropceanu, V., Cornil, J., da Silva Filho, D. A., Olivier, Y., Silbey, R., & Brédas, J.-L. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050140x · Cited by 4,607
Density-functional thermochemistry. I. The effect of the exchange-only gradient correction
Becke, A. D. (1992) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.462066 · Cited by 3,941
Bond Dissociation Energies of Organic Molecules
Blanksby, S. J., & Ellison, G. B. (2003) · ChemInform · doi:10.1002/chin.200324299 · Cited by 3,376
Atoms in Molecules — a Quantum Theory
Orville-Thomas, W. J. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM · doi:10.1016/s0166-1280(96)90925-2 · Cited by 2,826
Metadata
- Authors
- Stuyver, T., Chen, B., Zeng, T., Geerlings, P., De Proft, F., & Hoffmann, R.
- Venue
- Chemical Reviews
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-10-08
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 11291-11351
- ISSN
- 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6890
- OpenAlex
- W2979928055
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 136
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do Diradicals Behave Like Radicals? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00260
- The paper
- Stuyver, T., Chen, B., Zeng, T., Geerlings, P., De Proft, F., & Hoffmann, R. (2019). Do Diradicals Behave Like Radicals? Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.