The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chemical looping combustion of solid fuels
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Chemical Looping Combustion (CLC) has arisen during last years as a very promising combustion technology for power plants and industrial applications, with inherent CO2 capture which reduces the energy penalty imposed on other competing technologies. The use of solid fuels in CLC has been highly developed in the last decade and currently stands at a technical readiness level (TRL) of 6. In this paper, experience gained during CLC operation in continuous units is reviewed and appraised, focusing mainly on technical and environmental issues relating to the use of solid fuels. Up to now, more than 2700 h of operational experience has been reported in 19 pilot plants ranging from 0.5 kWth to 4 MWth. When designing a CLC unit of solid fuels, the preferred configuration for the scale-up is a two circulating fluidized beds (CFB) system. Coal has been the most commonly used solid fuel in CLC, but biomass has recently emerged as a very promising option to achieve negative emissions using bioenergy with carbon dioxide capture and storage (BECCS). Mostly low cost iron and manganese materials have been used as oxygen carriers in the so called in-situ gasification CLC (iG-CLC). The development of Chemical Looping with Oxygen Uncoupling (CLOU) makes a qualitative step forward in the solid fuel combustion, due to the use of materials able to release oxygen. The performance and environmental issues of CLC of solid fuels is evaluated here. Regarding environmental aspects, the pollutant emissions (SO2, NOx, etc.) released into the atmosphere from the air reactor are no cause of concern for the environment. However, the presence of SO2, NOx and Hg at the exit of the fuel reactor affects CO2 quality, which must be taken into account during the later compression and purification stages. The effect of the main variables affecting CLC performance is evaluated for fuel conversion, CO2 capture rate, and combustion efficiency obtained in different CLC units. Solid fuel conversion is normally not complete during operation, due to the undesired loss of char. A methodology is presented to extrapolate the current information to what could be expected in a larger CLC system. CO2 capture near 100% has been reported using a highly efficient carbon stripper, highly reactive fuels (such as lignites and biomass, etc.) or by the CLOU process. Operational experience in iG-CLC has showed that it is not possible to reach complete fuel combustion, making an additional oxygen polishing step necessary. For the further scale-up, it is essential to reduce the unburnt compounds at the fuel reactor outlet. Proposals to achieve this reduction already exist and include both improvement to the gas-oxygen carrier contact, or new design concepts based on the current scheme for iG-CLC. In addition, CLOU based on copper materials has shown that complete fuel combustion could be achieved. Main challenges for the future development and scale-up of CLC technology have been also identified. A breakthrough in the future development of CLC technology for solid fuels will come from developing long-life materials for CLOU that are easy to recover from the ash purge stream.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fuss, S., Canadell, J. G., Peters, G. P., Tavoni, M., Andrew, R. M., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Jones, C. D., Kraxner, F., Nakicenovic, N., et al. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2392 · Cited by 1,114
The cost of CO2 capture and storage
Rubin, E. S., Davison, J. E., & Herzog, H. J. (2015) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018 · Cited by 1,008
Negative emissions physically needed to keep global warming below 2 °C
Gasser, T., Guivarch, C., Tachiiri, K., Jones, C. D., & Ciais, P. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8958 · Cited by 374
Cited by
Perspective on the hydrogen economy as a pathway to reach net-zero CO2emissions in Europe
van der Spek, M., Banet, C., Bauer, C., Gabrielli, P., Goldthorpe, W., Mazzotti, M., Munkejord, S. T., Røkke, N. A., Shah, N., Sunny, N., et al. (2022) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee02118d · Cited by 423
Hu, Q., Shen, Y., Chew, J. W., Ge, T., & Wang, C.-H. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.122346 · Cited by 292
Progress in CFD Simulations of Fluidized Beds for Chemical and Energy Process Engineering
Alobaid, F., Almohammed, N., Massoudi Farid, M., May, J., Rößger, P., Richter, A., & Epple, B. (2022) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100930 · Cited by 266
A Combined Overview of Combustion, Pyrolysis, and Gasification of Biomass
Akhtar, A., Krepl, V., & Ivanova, T. (2018) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b01678 · Cited by 243
Carbon Capture Technologies: A Review on Technology Readiness Level
Hekmatmehr, H., Esmaeili, A., Pourmahdi, M., Atashrouz, S., Abedi, A., Ali Abuswer, M., Nedeljkovic, D., Latifi, M., Farag, S., & Mohaddespour, A. (2024) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.130898 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Adánez, J., Abad, A., Mendiara, T., Gayán, P., de Diego, L. F., & García-Labiano, F.
- Venue
- Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 65
- Pages
- 6-66
- ISSN
- 0360-1285 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2775185835
- Cited by
- 612
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical looping combustion of solid fuels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.07.005
- The paper
- Adánez, J., Abad, A., Mendiara, T., Gayán, P., de Diego, L. F., & García-Labiano, F. (2018). Chemical looping combustion of solid fuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.07.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.