The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SOx/NOx Removal from Flue Gas Streams by Solid Adsorbents: A Review of Current Challenges and Future Directions
Abstract
One of the main challenges in the power and chemical industries is to remove generated toxic or environmentally harmful gases before atmospheric emission. To comply with stringent environmental and pollutant emissions control regulations, coal-fired power plants must be equipped with new technologies that are efficient and less energy-intensive than status quo technologies for flue gas cleanup. While conventional sulfur oxide (SO x ) and nitrogen oxide (NO x ) removal technologies benefit from their large-scale implementation and maturity, they are quite energy-intensive. In view of this, the development of lower-cost, less energy-intensive technologies could offer an advantage. Significant energy and cost savings can potentially be realized by using advanced adsorbent materials. One of the major barriers to the development of such technologies remains the development of materials that are efficient and productive in removing flue gas contaminants. In this review, adsorption-based removal of SO x /NO x impurities from flue gas is discussed, with a focus on important attributes of the solid adsorbent materials as well as implementation of the materials in conventional and emerging acid gas removal technologies. The requirements for effective adsorbents are noted with respect to their performance, key limitations, and suggested future research directions. The final section includes some key areas for future research and provides a possible roadmap for the development of technologies for the removal of flue gas impurities that are more efficient and cost-effective than status quo approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: a review
Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J., Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J., et al. (2005) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005 · Cited by 3,244
Separation of CO2 from Flue Gas: A Review
Aaron, D., & Tsouris, C. (2005) · Separation Science and Technology · doi:10.1081/ss-200042244 · Cited by 1,525
Metal-organic frameworks with high capacity and selectivity for harmful gases
Britt, D., Tranchemontagne, D., & Yaghi, O. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0804900105 · Cited by 958
High-Capacity Hydrogen and Nitric Oxide Adsorption and Storage in a Metal−Organic Framework
Xiao, B., Wheatley, P. S., Zhao, X., Fletcher, A. J., Fox, S., Rossi, A. G., Megson, I. L., Bordiga, S., Regli, L., Thomas, K. M., et al. (2007) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja066098k · Cited by 612
Thermal and Chemical Stability of Regenerable Solid Amine Sorbent for CO2 Capture
Khatri, R. A., Chuang, S. S. C., Soong, Y., & Gray, M. (2006) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef050402y · Cited by 421
McKinlay, A. C., Xiao, B., Wragg, D. S., Wheatley, P. S., Megson, I. L., & Morris, R. E. (2008) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja801997r · Cited by 417
Removal of SOx and NOx over activated carbon fibers
Mochida, I., Korai, Y., Shirahama, M., Kawano, S., Hada, T., Seo, Y., Yoshikawa, M., & Yasutake, A. (2000) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/s0008-6223(99)00179-7 · Cited by 414
Amine-oxide hybrid materials for acid gas separations
Bollini, P., Didas, S. A., & Jones, C. W. (2011) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c1jm12522b · Cited by 397
Self-citationXu, X., Song, C., Miller, B. G., & Scaroni, A. W. (2005) · Fuel Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.01.002 · Cited by 308
Nitric Oxide Adsorption and Delivery in Flexible MIL-88(Fe) Metal–Organic Frameworks
McKinlay, A. C., Eubank, J. F., Wuttke, S., Xiao, B., Wheatley, P. S., Bazin, P., Lavalley, J.-C., Daturi, M., Vimont, A., De Weireld, G., et al. (2013) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm304037x · Cited by 294
Cited by
Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects
Pérez-Botella, E., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140 · Cited by 1,126
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs): potential and challenges for capture and abatement of ammonia
Vikrant, K., Kumar, V., Kim, K.-H., & Kukkar, D. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c7ta07847a · Cited by 299
Perspectives of Engineered Biochar for Environmental Applications: A Review
Haghighi Mood, S., Pelaez-Samaniego, M. R., & Garcia-Perez, M. (2022) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c01201 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Rezaei, F., Rownaghi, A. A., Monjezi, S., Lively, R. P., & Jones, C. W.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-08-18
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5467-5486
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2308729898
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 17.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SOx/NOx Removal from Flue Gas Streams by Solid Adsorbents: A Review of Current Challenges and Future Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b01286
- The paper
- Rezaei, F., Rownaghi, A. A., Monjezi, S., Lively, R. P., & Jones, C. W. (2015). SOx/NOx Removal from Flue Gas Streams by Solid Adsorbents: A Review of Current Challenges and Future Directions. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b01286
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
