The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
First Direct and Unequivocal Electron Spin Resonance Spin-Trapping Evidence for pH-Dependent Production of Hydroxyl Radicals from Sulfate Radicals
Abstract
Abstract Recently, the sulfate radical (SO4•–) has been found to exhibit broad application prospects in various research fields such as chemical, biomedical, and environmental sciences. It has been suggested that SO4•– could be transformed into a more reactive hydroxyl radical (•OH); however, no direct and unequivocal experimental evidence has been reported yet. In this study, using an electron spin resonance (ESR) secondary radical spin-trapping method coupled with the classic spin-trapping agent 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) and the typical •OH-scavenging agent dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), we found that •OH can be produced from three SO4•–-generating systems from weakly acidic (pH = 5.5) to alkaline conditions (optimal at pH = 13.0), while SO4•– is the predominant radical species at pH < 5.5. A comparative study with three typical •OH-generating systems strongly supports the above conclusion. This is the first direct and unequivocal ESR spin-trapping evidence for •OH formation from SO4•– over a wide pH range, which is of great significance to understand and study the mechanism of many SO4•–-related reactions and processes. This study also provides an effective and direct method for unequivocally distinguishing •OH from SO4•–.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buxton, G. V., Greenstock, C. L., Helman, W. P., & Ross, A. B. (1988) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555805 · Cited by 12,332
Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine
Halliwell, B., & Gutteridge, J. M. C. (2015) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198717478.001.0001 · Cited by 8,990
Pignatello, J. J., Oliveros, E., & MacKay, A. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380500326564 · Cited by 4,133
Cited by
Zong, Y., Shao, Y., Zeng, Y., Shao, B., Xu, L., Zhao, Z., Liu, W., & Wu, D. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c00375 · Cited by 499
Self-citationRen, W., Huang, X., Wang, L., Liu, X., Zhou, Z., Wang, Y., Lin, C., He, M., & Ouyang, W. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.131876 · Cited by 75
Gasim, M. F., Choong, Z.-Y., Koo, P.-L., Low, S.-C., Abdurahman, M.-H., Ho, Y.-C., Mohamad, M., Suryawan, I. W. K., Lim, J.-W., & Oh, W.-D. (2022) · Catalysts · doi:10.3390/catal12020210 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, H.-Y., Huang, C.-H., Mao, L., Shao, B., Shao, J., Yan, Z.-Y., Tang, M., & Zhu, B.-Z.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-10-16
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 14046-14056
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W3092691791
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.