CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rebuttal to Correspondence on “Defluorination of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) by Acidimicrobium sp. Strain A6”

Jaffé, Peter R., Huang, Shan·2023·Environmental Science & Technology
DOI 10.1021/acs.est.3c07853
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recommendations W e thank the authors for their interest in our work and for their comments.We were fully aware that our findings, that PFOA and PFOS can be defluorinated by the novel Acidimicrobium sp.strain A6, did challenge the belief that perfluorinated compounds may not be degradable.Hence, we did spend an extra year prior to publishing our results repeating the experiments and analyses multiple times, varying the electron donor for Acidimicrobium sp.strain A6 (NH 4 + and H 2 ), varying the initial PFOA/PFOS concentration, having PFAS analyzed by two separate commercial laboratories, and analyzing fluoride via two different IC methods as well as using a fluoride-specific probe.Incubations were done with multiple controls, including autoclaved, a control without NH 4 + , and

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.3c07853

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1021/acs.est.3c06681 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1021/acs.est.8b00487 · DOI
  3. 10.1021/acs.est.0c01646 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s11051-013-1705-3 · DOI
  5. 10.1088/1757-899X/188/1/012056 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.074 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127699 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133506 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132039 · DOI
  10. 10.5194/bg-12-769-2015 · DOI
  11. 10.1128/AEM.02029-18 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.189 · DOI
  13. Huff Chester, A. L. Zeolite Incorporated Materials for Targeted Biomass Retention and Pollutant Removal. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 2022 (https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/250423).
  14. 10.1039/D3EW00101F · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.130903 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jaffé, P. R., & Huang, S.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, United States
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2023-11-01
Volume
57
Issue
48
Pages
20443-20447
ISSN
  • 0013-936X
  • 1520-5851
DOI
10.1021/acs.est.3c07853
Cited by
16
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review