The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metal-Based Nanotoxicity and Detoxification Pathways in Higher Plants
Abstract
The potential risks from metal-based nanoparticles (NPs) in the environment have increased with the rapidly rising demand for and use of nanoenabled consumer products. Plant's central roles in ecosystem function and food chain integrity ensure intimate contact with water and soil systems, both of which are considered sinks for NPs accumulation. In this review, we document phytotoxicity caused by metal-based NPs exposure at physiological, biochemical, and molecular levels. Although the exact mechanisms of plant defense against nanotoxicity are unclear, several relevant studies have been recently published. Possible detoxification pathways that might enable plant resistance to oxidative stress and facilitate NPs detoxification are reviewed herein. Given the importance of understanding the effects and implications of metal-based NPs on plants, future research should focus on the following: (1) addressing key knowledge gaps in understanding molecular and biochemical responses of plants to NPs stress through global transcriptome, proteome, and metablome assays; (2) designing long-term experiments under field conditions at realistic exposure concentrations to investigate the impact of metal-based NPs on edible crops and the resulting implications to the food chain and to human health; and (3) establishing an impact assessment to evaluate the effects of metal-based NPs on plants with regard to ecosystem structure and function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction
Apel, K., & Hirt, H. (2004) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701 · Cited by 11,723
Carocho, M., & Ferreira, I. C. F. R. (2013) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2012.09.021 · Cited by 1,661
Cited by
Tripathi, D. K., Shweta, Singh, S., Singh, S., Pandey, R., Singh, V. P., Sharma, N. C., Prasad, S. M., Dubey, N. K., & Chauhan, D. K. (2017) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.07.030 · Cited by 935
Impacts of Silver Nanoparticles on Plants: A Focus on the Phytotoxicity and Underlying Mechanism
Yan, A., & Chen, Z. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20051003 · Cited by 527
Zuverza-Mena, N., Martínez-Fernández, D., Du, W., Hernandez-Viezcas, J. A., Bonilla-Bird, N., López-Moreno, M. L., Komárek, M., Peralta-Videa, J. R., & Gardea-Torresdey, J. L. (2017) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.05.037 · Cited by 426
Servin, A. D., & White, J. C. (2016) · NanoImpact · doi:10.1016/j.impact.2015.12.002 · Cited by 384
Self-citationDu, W., Tan, W., Peralta-Videa, J. R., Gardea-Torresdey, J. L., Ji, R., Yin, Y., & Guo, H. (2017) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.04.024 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, C., White, J. C., Dhankher, O. P., & Xing, B.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-06-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7109-7122
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2412300165
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metal-Based Nanotoxicity and Detoxification Pathways in Higher Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.est.5b00685
- The paper
- Ma, C., White, J. C., Dhankher, O. P., & Xing, B. (2015). Metal-Based Nanotoxicity and Detoxification Pathways in Higher Plants. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00685
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.